GDT: UFC on ESPN: Tsarukyan vs. Gamrot/Bellator 282: Mousasi vs. Eblen/PFL 5

Chaels Arms

Formerly Lias Andersson
Aug 26, 2010
7,303
6,888
New York City
Giving this fight to Tsarukyan. I think Gamrot is going to be disappointed but he didn't do anything with any of the takedowns he got. Great fight though and another great Fight Night.
 

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
Round 1/2 for Tsarukyan should be clear, but the last 3 rounds are closer. I have it 49-46Tsarukyan, giving him 1/2/4/5.

But, I'm fine with 50-45. If someone went 3-2 Gamrot I wouldn't care that much either. Close rounds.
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
23,451
19,253
Think Tsarukyan wins this because those take downs didn’t amount to much
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
23,451
19,253
Eh I don’t think they got this right. Either Tsarukyan or Draw. A lot of take downs didn’t do much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chaels Arms

m9

m9
Sponsor
Jan 23, 2010
25,107
15,229
I actually think this fight wasn't great for either guy. Tsarukyan's TDD and lack of ability in scrambles will be a problem if he doesn't improve.
 

I am not exposed

Registered User
Mar 16, 2014
22,134
10,579
Vancouver
It was close. Thought it would be split between the judges. 3-2 Gamrot is what I had.

Tsarukyan wishes it was a 3 round fight! He was looking at the clock for 2 rounds!
 

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,371
44,773
Hell baby
Rounds 1/2 were no question for Arman, and rounds 4/5 were no question for Garmot, it's more about round 3, and I thought Garmot looked slightly better there.

Make the argument for round 4.

Round 3 was closer than round 4, regardless of what felder says
 

Bunk Moreland

Registered User
Mar 16, 2010
15,598
1,188
Long Island
I don’t know how anybody can score round 4 for Gamrot.

He got outstruck 21-7 and got dropped! Control time does not matter in this instance

Bad cards. Judges don’t know the criteria.
Its nuts. And recently there's been a trend towards the criteria where damage is the main point and judges haven't been valuing control as much.
 

bov

Registered User
Nov 13, 2010
7,215
3,338
Can't complain about 3-2 Gamrot. He dug deep and I felt was the better fighter in the second half of the fight. Could've gone either way.

Nobody's stock went down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I am not exposed

CDJ

Registered User
Nov 20, 2006
55,371
44,773
Hell baby
Its nuts. And recently there's been a trend towards the criteria where damage is the main point and judges haven't been valuing control as much.

Literally did a 180 on how they score fights, it’s f***ing bullshit

Its the biggest problem that plagues the sport
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sol

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad