GDT: Trades & Free Agency Thread - Off-Season Early Edition
- Thread starter Mess
- Start date
- Status
Mickey Marner
Registered User
I anticipate a lot of big names on that list. Some will be protected through trades, but I think their list to pick from will have better name recognition than Vegas' did.
Americanadian
Registered User
I could see Lou looking at Rielly to replace Leddy. Would make sense in a swap for Beauvillier.
I’m still a little upset the leafs didn’t try to make one more deal to get a better forward.
if we are going 7-3-1. Why waste the last spot on simmonds/engvall/Anderson?
there will undoubtedly be a better forward exposed.
if we are going 7-3-1. Why waste the last spot on simmonds/engvall/Anderson?
there will undoubtedly be a better forward exposed.
TheDoldrums
Registered User
dubplatepressure
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2007
- 15,840
- 3,463
why in the everloving f*** would we expose McCann. The only sense I can make from that is that we're giving something to Seattle to take Kerfoot - maybe a 3rd or something.
Leafs just big brained this and I think they completely butchered it.
I was fine losing Kerfoot because I figured we could use that money elsewhere. It baffles me that we would trade for a guy and expose him.
For what? Holl? Unbelievable.
I was fine losing Kerfoot because I figured we could use that money elsewhere. It baffles me that we would trade for a guy and expose him.
For what? Holl? Unbelievable.
Mickey Marner
Registered User
Coachcorner
Senor Martinez
- Sep 28, 2017
- 6,285
- 4,989
Hello. How many hours is there still to go when those lists are published sire?
This is the time to be an nhl investor. HARD!!!
We LOVE this gezame!!!
Griffin76
Registered User
Can he be selected, traded to say Ottawa with retention, and then traded to Montreal with retention again?
Would cost Montreal a lot of picks/prospects but Price at half/quarter of his salary would be huge.
SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,773
I don't think paying Seattle to have them take a guy they should be taking anyways is really any better.
I think there is either a deal in place where the Leafs are paying Kerfoot's bonus and they compensate us, or the Leafs want to keep Kerfoot and don't care if they lose Dermott or McCann/Hallander.
TheGroceryStick
Registered User
Kerfoot agreed on - with incentive. (Imo)
McCann grabbed while he held "less" value during expansion posturing by Pitt... and won't be picked even though he's exposed by Tor
hockeynorth
Registered User
- Aug 31, 2017
- 12,592
- 6,386
dubplatepressure
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2007
- 15,840
- 3,463
Coachcorner
Senor Martinez
- Sep 28, 2017
- 6,285
- 4,989
Dion TheFluff
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2015
- 3,901
- 3,352
If Seattle end up taking McCann, I'm gonna be irate! I've supported Dubas but this was just a bone head move he we end up loosing him!
SeaOfBlue
The Passion That Unites Us All
- Aug 1, 2013
- 35,591
- 16,773
Even if it means we get to keep Dermott and Kerfoot?
He won't. Coleman is good but he isn't 5mil+ a year good. 50 points should be no more than 4mil but even then that's still pushing it a bit given he did that with the Lightning. He's also 29, soon to be 30 this year. I think anywhere between 3-4 would be good. Ideally, 3mil.
I think him and Hyman will end up getting very identical contracts.
They're both in the same tier. If what Hyman is rumored to get is true, Coleman will look for a 5+ year deal for 5+ million easily. I rate Coleman a tad higher due to his skating but they're fairly even.
Can he be selected, traded to say Ottawa with retention, and then traded to Montreal with retention again?
I don't think so but someone that knows more about the cap can probably answer that forsure.
- Status
