NJG
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2015
- 260
- 213
Sure. If they offered Matthews they might have a shot.If they really wanted to they could get him.
I'd give up Rielly and two first's for him and more if that's what it would take. You can replace those lots prospects easily in free agency.Sure. If they offered Matthews they might have a shot.
No I'm trashing him because he's horrible defensively and not the kind of player we need. not because of plus minus.1 post since 2015, and now just trashing Rielly because of plus minus? Troll
You were literally using plus minus to downgrade him as a player. Don't back off now.No I'm trashing him because he's horrible defensively and not the kind of player we need. not because of plus minus.
Over rated and poor defensively. Gets sheltered minutes. He played better this year but still was not great.Ekblad isnt even a top 25 dman
Who is this guy, and why does he have computer access?
I think the Leafs should trade every player who scores for every player who can't; because obviously, that means they are winners.
I'm now ignoring this a**clown.Mods, why are trolls like these allowed to roam free here?
He is the same guy who said he was a 3rd pair d man and he had a special formula which proved it. Now using Ekblad as a player who he thinks is better then Rielly. Every GM in the league would take Reilly over Ekblad in a trade and that includes Florida.1 post since 2015, and now just trashing Rielly because of plus minus? Troll
Rielly ain't either.
Lol thats hilarious.He is the same guy who said he was a 3rd pair d man and he had a special formula which proved it. Now using Ekblad as a player who he thinks is better then Rielly. Every GM in the league would trade Reilly over Ekblad in a trade and that includes Florida.
Ekblad is a bigger, taller and younger version of Barrie.Over rated and poor defensively. Gets sheltered minutes. He played better this year but still was not great.
Maybe the mods can check his IP address and shut down this troll account as this is one of many accounts this clown has.He is the same guy who said he was a 3rd pair d man and he had a special formula which proved it. Now using Ekblad as a player who he thinks is better then Rielly. Every GM in the league would take Reilly over Ekblad in a trade and that includes Florida.
He's a forward that plays defense. Defense is not his trait.... offense is.... last time I checked we needed defense not offense.
Yes a turnover machine. Barrie played exactly like I knew he would this year.Ekblad is a bigger, taller and younger version of Barrie.
Who is this guy, and why does he have computer access?
I think the Leafs should trade every player who scores for every player who can't; because obviously, that means they are winners.
Nonsense post.
Rielly was our second best player after Matthews. He made the one brutal giveaway after being gassed playing half the game on a back-to-back. Otherwise he was like Superman when it came to holding the line and making pinches to maintain zone possession. The only reason any line besides Matthews' was able to sustain zone time was because of his play and he did it while babysitting crap partners like Ceci and Holl.
The reason he was a -1 was because he had a .929 PDO (lowest in the playoffs) including a 0% on-ice shooting percentage. Hard to be a positive player when literally no Leaf scored while you were on the ice at 5v5 against Columbus.
It's frankly baffling that someone could watch how poorly we played in his absence and then how we played in his return against Tampa Bay in arguably our most dominant game of the season and conclude he's a problem.