darkwingduck
Registered User
Certainly doable.
Agreed. I'm in favor of the mirror of sorts, trade cam for 1st and cheap 3c (pageau, larsson) and then spend the money on LW.
But tatar and spend money on 3C i can get behind.
Certainly doable.
I think it fits perfectly with Anaheims Cup window, as does Fowlers cheap contract. Use that money to spend to the cap. If we go for it these next two seasons and lose him for nothing I wouldn't really care, win or lose at least we really went after it. And we'll lose someone of value in the expansion draft regardless so that's a non-factor for me as well.I'd like to think so, especially with the Cup window that Anaheim has. I'm just not sure they'd look at it that way.
Agreed. I'm in favor of the mirror of sorts, trade cam for 1st and cheap 3c (pageau, larsson) and then spend the money on LW.
But tatar and spend money on 3C i can get behind.
Ducks will get $16.66M from LV expansion fee. Could the ownership spend more taking that money into consideration?
I think it fits perfectly with Anaheims Cup window, as does Fowlers cheap contract. Use that money to spend to the cap. If we go for it these next two seasons and lose him for nothing I wouldn't really care, win or lose at least we really went after it. And we'll lose someone of value in the expansion draft regardless so that's a non-factor for me as well.
Trading Fowler for a 1st and a 3C is terrible just terrible.
I disagree, both ottawa and buffalos pick are better (8,12 vs 16) and both centers are <1m$. Money saved you can spend on a deeper pool of LW.
If Fowler and Despres are being shopped this means they try to prepare the roster for being competitive while modifying it for the expansion draft. Tough process if you ask me. And they likely think that they can not afford Cam. They need to protect him but will lose him due to our internal budget.
Quite interesting that Vatanen and Lindholm are rated higher than Cam.
I disagree, both ottawa and buffalos pick are better (8,12 vs 16) and both centers are <1m$. Money saved you can spend on a deeper pool of LW.
When's the last time Anaheim ended up with a top 6 forward from FA?
Are you saying Dany Heatley wasn't a top 6 forward?!
When's the last time Anaheim ended up with a top 6 forward from FA?
Depending on how Kruger's contract is paid out, that might be a viable option for our 3C. It would certainly help relieve some of the defensive pressure off of Kesler's shoulders.
Depending on how Kruger's contract is paid out, that might be a viable option for our 3C. It would certainly help relieve some of the defensive pressure off of Kesler's shoulders.
He makes more than Cogs (some think we may have to move him because of contract) and had 4 points last year (0 goals).
He makes more than Cogs (some think we may have to move him because of contract) and had 4 points last year (0 goals).
his base salary for next year is 2M. He has 1.475M as a "signing bonus". Depending if that's already been paid, or if it's paid July 1st and Chicago is on the hook for it, 2M is not a bad option for a 3C. He's also a defensive forward much like Pahlsson was. Pahlsson put up similar offensive numbers (career high 26) Kruger has career high (28). Not expecting huge point totals out of him.
Trading Fowler for a 1st and a 3C is terrible just terrible. Trading him for Tatar and a pick is fine. Regardless we need to get rid of other defenseman we have.
Would you rather have Perron + 8th overall or Tatar + 16th pick?
Would you rather have Perron + 8th overall or Tatar + pick?
Fixed it for you.
And I would pick Perron + 8th (Nylander or Keller)
Why are you bringing up Perron? Murray has made it clear he wants to go after a player that is a left shooting LW, that's not Perron.