sampollock
Registered User
Making the same comment a thousand times won't change anything...
that is correct, but this whole thread is about maybe's
Making the same comment a thousand times won't change anything...
Galchenyuk for Ryan Reaves
Galchenyuk caused a distraction/poor character.
Reaves is a good grinder.
this trade courtesy the mind of MT/MB
MT would probably prefer AG for Garbutt
Nill is the type of DG that can pull a trade like this. Go Nill.
Garbutt plays for the Hawks. He scored against us last night.
Molson needs to go see MB and tell him "I'm not here to tell you what to do... but here's what you got to do"...
Can't believe that clown MT is still coaching this team. No need to make a MB trade (low cost low risk type deal) at the moment. This team is nothing without Price.
A good coach would bring a good system and could profite from better additions. Right now, it's wasting assets.
Basically, MB should trade Weise, Eller, DD and Emelin... and entertain offers for Plekanec and Markov.
We won't win anything with MT as coach... plus what a boring brand of hockey...
Molson needs to go see MB and tell him "I'm not here to tell you what to do... but here's what you got to do"...
Can't believe that clown MT is still coaching this team. No need to make a MB trade (low cost low risk type deal) at the moment. This team is nothing without Price.
A good coach would bring a good system and could profite from better additions. Right now, it's wasting assets.
Basically, MB should trade Weise, Eller, DD and Emelin... and entertain offers for Plekanec and Markov.
We won't win anything with MT as coach... plus what a boring brand of hockey...
Do you think most rental or prospect trades are made for the best prospects in hockey?
The prospects traded last year...J.Caron, J.Lindstrom, Sgarbossa, plus a lot of 2nd to 7th round picks.