Vachon23
Registered User
I mean we where a top 5 team in the league in Price prime (2012-2016) and made the semi final and we where far from having a good offenceAnd of course, we have the example of Price to prove that's not true.
I mean we where a top 5 team in the league in Price prime (2012-2016) and made the semi final and we where far from having a good offenceAnd of course, we have the example of Price to prove that's not true.
I mean we where a top 5 team in the league in Price prime (2012-2016) and made the semi final and we where far from having a good offence
Me eitherI would not bank on Askarov being at Price's level.
Me either
But I would that he’s gonna be elite
I would go higher then that but I wouldn’t put the 5oaVery interested but not desperate. If the price was higher than Jets 1st and Primeau, I pass. And I suspect the price is higher.
I would go higher then that but I wouldn’t put the 5oa
Sorry but your memory is letting you down. You mentioned 2012-2016.I mean we where a top 5 team in the league in Price prime (2012-2016) and made the semi final and we where far from having a good offence
2015-16 Price was injuredSorry but your memory is letting you down. You mentioned 2012-2016.
2011-2012 Finished 28th OA - no playoffs
2012-2013 Finished 4th OA - out in the 1st round
2013-2014 Finished 9th OA - out in the Conference final
2014-2015 Finished 2nd OA - Out the 2nd round
2015-2016 Finished 22nd OA - Guess what? No playoffs
Next year pick CGY or MTL pickWhat do we have that is higher than that and something we can spare but not the 5th pick? Seems difficult.
Is there another NHL team who would trade their #1Dman, never mind one coming off a 62pt campaign on a very affordable deal signed for another 2 years, for so little?Wont happen but trading Matheson could be great for our future
Matheson to DET for 15th overall
Trade 15th overall + Jets pick to move up
We can leave the draft with Demidov/Lindstrom + Sennecke/Helenius/Eiserman or one of the top RD’s
The price would definitely be higher than the Jets 1st + Primeau. Nashville has absolutely no reason to trade Askarov for such a low return.Very interested but not desperate. If the price was higher than Jets 1st and Primeau, I pass. And I suspect the price is higher.
The price would definitely be higher than the Jets 1st + Primeau. Nashville has absolutely no reason to trade Askarov for such a low return.
Wont happen but trading Matheson could be great for our future
Matheson to DET for 15th overall
Trade 15th overall + Jets pick to move up
We can leave the draft with Demidov/Lindstrom + Sennecke/Helenius/Eiserman or one of the top RD’s
Nothing, but I would doWhat would you say if both Monahan and Toffoli are back next year on 2 year deals?
Doesn't this make us a better team with Dach returning? Fit our chase the playoffs strategy but we are not trading and futures to do it?
Sakic strategy has MacKinnon Makar Rantanen ... If we had that kind of talent then sure it could work but war far from having itWait it out then. If they want guaranteed starter price today, just wait and pay it later when they can't keep both goalies anymore.
My interests today is buy low so if they say no, sure. I'll take my chances with Montry, Primeau, Fowler. If they don't work out, I would have no problem having Sakic's strategy in net.
To me it's pretty simple, if a team wants to meet the value that a swift skating, 60pt, 25Min+, who signed to a *very* reasonable, 4.875M for this coming year and the one after, than fine.Trading Matheson still doesn't make much sense to me. Sure his value on the market is very high but he's also extremely valuable for us.
We need our prospects to earn their time in the NHL, not be given minutes because we traded the more talented veteran players away.
He just turned 30 in February, not 35.
Exactly, Matheson is not on the market but if someone is desperate and wants to pay the price then bank on itTo me it's pretty simple, if a team wants to meet the value that a swift skating, 60pt, 25Min+, who signed to a *very* reasonable, 4.875M for this coming year and the one after, than fine.
Pay the price.
Hughes said that he probably wouldn't go get a vet RD and sign him 3-4 years because that would block Mailloux or Reinbacher's long term progress. There's not much to interpret in that statement.With your interpretation of Hughes's statement, then you also need to trade Savard. And I don't buy the left side has more prospects than the right. Matheson is more valuable to the team and provides more bang for your buck than Savard. Also, after Guhle and Kovacevic all the other defence prospects are still wet behind the ears. In addition which prospect will provide what Matheson does? Maybe Hutson and he needs a mentor. Savard ain't it.
Monahan yes but no to Toffoli. Id rather Roy have a full season in the NHL.What would you say if both Monahan and Toffoli are back next year on 2 year deals?
Doesn't this make us a better team with Dach returning? Fit our chase the playoffs strategy but we are not trading and futures to do it?
I'm just truly shocked at how some here value him...15th overall for Matheson???Exactly, Matheson is not on the market but if someone is desperate and wants to pay the price then bank on it
Can the other team's #1 D actually play defense or is it Matheson level defense?I'm just truly shocked at how some here value him...15th overall for Matheson???
That's it???
What other team could you go to today to acquire their #1Dman for a mid 1st round pick?
Madness to me
Yes for the 15oa is clearly not enough, all though he wouldn’t be the #1 Dmen on a contending teamI'm just truly shocked at how some here value him...15th overall for Matheson???
That's it???
What other team could you go to today to acquire their #1Dman for a mid 1st round pick?
Madness to me
Nothing, but I would do
Monahan yes but no to Toffoli. Id rather Roy have a full season in the NHL.
They bring nothing we can not develop #1 and #2 I'd rather get another lottery pick than make the playoffs with those 2. It would just yield some average pick with 2 contracts we'd want to get rid of. No thanks.Why? Because you think they can't help us or do you think they would block someone? Explain
Firstly, while I don't think Matheson's defense is in the elite category...he's certainly not nearly as bad as most Habs fans think he is.Can the other team's #1 D actually play defense or is it Matheson level defense?