Confirmed Signing with Link: [TOR] F Auston Matthews signs extension with the Maple Leafs (4 years, $13.25M AAV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,961
20,612
Aav is fine for a top 5 player with a massive cap spike. With the remaining year on his deal this is 5 years of knowing AM34 anchors the franchise.

They’ll never win anything with their core players on being among the highest paid players.

They’ll never get the advantage of them being on value contracts
 

surixon

Registered User
Jul 12, 2003
49,394
71,170
Winnipeg
Takes him through the rest of his prime so on that front I don't mind the term. But that cap hit is ludicrous given what other star centers are making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bh53

BB88

Registered User
Jan 19, 2015
40,961
20,612
Max term is a disadvantage at 26, not an advantage. Do you think Toews was worth 10.5M last year, or the year before?

They paid more to get him at his prime before the decline. However, they shouldn't be paying for years he sucks like Chicago had to with Toews.

You realize Leafs will try to re-sign him after this one and the cap hit will be even higher?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TS Quint

Rich Nixon

No Prior Knowledge of "Flyers"
Jul 11, 2006
15,006
19,060
Key Biscayne
Only 4 years? Matthews is a sack. No other superstar pulls this shit.

This is going to be the way of the future whether you like it or not.

And I don't know what there is to be mad about. He's now under contract with his team for the next 5 seasons at a price the team was willing to pay. At the end of it, he can sign a very large and 8-year deal in a more favorable cap environment, and that one will take him close to retirement age.

If he suffers a career-altering injury before that happens? Well, then he's left $50m or so on the table at this price point. But if he signs 8 years now, he's probably also leaving $30m+ on the table at the tail end of his career. There's risk built in on both sides of it for the player.

So, you can rabble around all you want about how dudes should take a paycut and stay with your team forever, but we're talking about 8-figure decisions here. The expectation that they sacrifice tens or hundreds of millions in their own financial flexibility to give their bosses more flexibility and time to figure out how to build a contender is just...unrealistic. Like, are you gonna turn down a 50% raise and the ability to seek other employment in the future so your company can buy you a better computer and get you an intern? It might make your life easier, but at the end of the day it isn't feeding your family (or at the scale we're talking about: generations of your family to come).

And these are the types of decisions dudes will be making much more frequently in the future. This is pro sports now. It's a f***-you-pay-me world and Matthews is not the first person to embrace that, and in hockey he will not be the last.
 
Last edited:

Nylanderthal

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
7,898
6,246
Is that supposed to be a shot? Lol
Quinn signed for 6 years at below market value
It’s supposed to be a way for you to realize that the term isn’t that bad. 5 years is a good median term to have a guy locked up. 9 years (what an 8 year extension would mean) is a long time, look how many of those deals age poorly. If he’s still worth it at 31 then they simply extend him then.
Do you think the hawks loved the last 4 years of that toews deal?
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
14,681
20,340
What? Malkin literally earns less now than he did during his 8 year deal - is that not a sign of a decline?
No he doesn't, more like 2/3 of it. And he signed that deal when he turned 36.

Matthews is supposed to be in a totally different category of a player than Tavares no? These superstars should not regress like the kinds of Tavares.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,926
15,812
Calgary
Matthews got term and aav. Guess master negotiator Tre was no better than Dubas.

Tbf the leaf’s had no leverage, and matthews has by all accounts wanted another payday down the line. 4 yrs was better than 2 or 3 for the leaf’s I guess.
 

Pierce Hawthorne

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Apr 29, 2012
45,423
43,218
Caverns of Draconis
Toronto fans are happy that they kept their guy.

Other team's fans are happy because Toronto's best guys continue to neuter them cap-wise.

Win-win.

Ya pretty much tbh. Leafs best players continue to make it so difficult for them to actually build a proper cup contender team. They're so close with that core group as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colorado Avalanche

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,162
13,316
You realize Leafs will try to re-sign him after this one and the cap hit will be even higher?

If I'm the Leafs I don't re-sign him unless it's a discount and/or shorter term.

It's not like Crosby got a higher cap or long term when his deal ended.
 

Dirty Dog

Wooftastic
Sponsor
Jul 11, 2013
11,567
13,997
The doghouse
He clearly had the team in a position of no leverage, and took full advantage of it. I mean, he got way more money than any other top player in the league, and held firm on short term.

it’s his right! It’s business! But, I can’t think of any other player that has done that any time recently?
 

Skinnyjimmy08

WorldTraveler
Mar 30, 2012
22,550
12,039
He's taking the risk of a major injury meaning he won't get another big deal, but obviously he's cool with that.
He's already made enough cash so that the next 10 generations of Matthews won't need to worry about cash lol... And he's shooting for even more and more and more
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devonator
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad