Top 5 (22 and under): NJD vs MTL vs DET vs OTT vs BUF vs ANA

Best

  • NJD: J.Hughes-Holtz-Mercer-L.Hughes-Nemec

  • MTL: Suzuki-Caufield-Slafkovsky-Dach-Guhle

  • DET: Raymond-Berggren-Seider-Edvinsson-Cossa(G)

  • OTT: Stutzle-Tkachuk-Greig-Pinto-Sanderson

  • BUF: Cozens-Quinn-Krebs-Power-Dahlin

  • ANA: Zegras-McTavish-Drysdale-Mintyukov-Zellweger


Results are only viewable after voting.

danisonfire

2313 Saint Catherine
Jul 2, 2009
1,521
591
missed that magical number by one. now we are doomed.
This certainly adds doubt to the overall success of the "rebuild". Is it time for major changes? Is this recoverable?

I am excited to watch New Jersey and New York beat each other up.
 

NyQuil

Big F$&*in Q
Jan 5, 2005
95,785
60,122
Ottawa, ON
Actually, Hughes was at 1.269. See ya next year!
Hopefully, next year the Sens are doing better. That way you don’t spend all your time bumping threads to assuage the pain of being a basement team again. More on that later too.

“Not in the same universe as Hughes.”

Proceeds to out produce him in pace and total points at the same age.

“Yeah well your team sucks.”

I wish I could say I was surprised.
 
Last edited:

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
4,738
4,635
Actually, Hughes was at 1.269. See ya next year!

Hopefully, next year the Sens are doing better. That way you don’t spend all your time bumping threads to assuage the pain of being a basement team again. More on that later too.
you're wasting your time. that guy doesn't understand stats.

hughes is clearly ahead here.
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.PIERRE★
Jul 26, 2005
23,597
12,980
Actually, Hughes was at 1.269. See ya next year!

Hopefully, next year the Sens are doing better. That way you don’t spend all your time bumping threads to assuage the pain of being a basement team again. More on that later too.

Stutzle 3, Hughes 0

Cope and seethe.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jersey Fresh

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
4,738
4,635
if you're going to try and make the arguement that stutzle > hughes than stutzles gonna have to put up a 100 pt season. until then its hughes all day.
 

swiftwin

★SUMMER.OF.PIERRE★
Jul 26, 2005
23,597
12,980
if you're going to try and make the arguement that stutzle > hughes than stutzles gonna have to put up a 100 pt season. until then its hughes all day.

Funny... Last year it was "Stutzle needs at least 1.14 PPG".

Keep moving those goalposts.

Right into the playoffs.

Cope, seethe, and cry.
Stay mad bro
 

cole von cole

Registered User
Mar 1, 2016
289
249
Actually, Hughes was at 1.269. See ya next year!

Hopefully, next year the Sens are doing better. That way you don’t spend all your time bumping threads to assuage the pain of being a basement team again. More on that later too.

Come on, you know what you said. Don't be like that

Of course it will. If Stutzle doesn’t pace Hughes ‘21-‘22 season that entire line of argument goes out the window, regardless of what Hughes does or doesn’t do. It’s up to Stutzle to prove the same linear development - that’s been the argument trotted out here time and time again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golden_Jet

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
22,824
11,145
Yes, and like I said, now the bar is Hughes superior numbers this season (and likely his subsequently higher numbers next season). Keep kicking that can down the road. That's why this is so dumb. You're just chasing the dragon.
Goalposts moving again lol, never change.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Jersey Fresh

Jersey Fresh

Video Et Taceo
Feb 23, 2004
26,239
9,182
T.A.
Goalposts moving again lol, never change.
Not really. If Stutzle didn't pace Hughes '21-'22 season, your incessant whining about linear development goes out the window. Now that he did, he needs to match Hughes' elevated numbers this season or the whole thing is meaningless. It's not a difficult concept, but I'm happy to repeat it for you.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad