The Utica Comets Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
2:00 to go now. Boucher had one threatening effort and missed the net.

Right off the draw another great chance for the Amerks, but wide. He walked all the way from the boards right into the slot. This is a very common occurrence on draws. First Amerks' goal tonight was off the draw. Faceoff straight back and then a pass into a wide open slot for a one timer and a goal.

Chatfield injured at the end. Official pushed him to the Comets bench before he got any assistance. If this is serious, get ready for the Friday's game with Stewart back in the lineup. He is the only extra D the Comets have carried since trading Subban. Yeah great management. No call for questioning the efforts of JB or the rising management star GM Johnson. The sole extra forward is PTO Brady Brassart who is only a first year ECHL call-up with 21 GP in his pro career before arriving in Utica. Played one game here on 12/6 and was a lost planet airman.

This is another example of brilliant management. Green always had at least 2 extra D and usually at least 3 forwards and possible replacements were acquired the second the #s were reduced. That would have been under Henning the first 2 seasons and Conacher when Vancouver appeared invisible between Henning's dismissal until Johnson's appointment this season. Perhaps green demanded players be found and Cull hasn't spoken up. It is 1st season as a head coach. maybe he doesn't know he can make requests/demands.

Robak, Landry, Ehrhardt, Shields, etc were all D-men who were acquired in a bunch of PTOs over the seasons and that's how guys who could actually play were found after a season began. Can't find anybody if you aren't even looking.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
On to the 3rd. Utica to the first PK of the game for either team. Woods for high sticking. at :40 seconds.

That didn't take long. PP goal for the Amerks. 1:17 of the 3rd.
C J. Smith. Undrafted after 3 years with NCAA U Mass - Lowell. he was 1.04 PPG for his 3-yr college career. Signed by Buffalo. Assigned to Rochester. 26 GP for Rochester counting tonight and for now 27 Pts.

The leading rookie scorer in the AHL hails from Des Moines, Iowa. One of only 2 players from the state of Iowa to ever play an NHL game. He was readily available on the open market. There's one that got away from most of the NHL.

3-1 Amerks.
 
Last edited:

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
We are down to near 7:00 minutes and the Comets are not exactly cranking up the offense to put on a push for the final minutes. They are not even getting any clear shots. Amerks playing D and the Comets can't crack the wall to even get into the zone. going on 5 minutes and still only 7 SOG. Fact is the Amerks are the ones exerting offensive pressure.

Comets with 24 points. 19, 20, 21, and 23 are the only lower point totals in the AHL .
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
Comets to the PP. It's score now or go home losers. The net is empty with 3:31 remaining. Comets can't even get set up with a 2-man advantage. Finally set up but all shots blocked and finally tipped out of play.

Utica calls time out. 2:36 left. :45 on the PP.

Puck back into the Comets zone. PP is almost done. Smith misses the empty net on the backhand. PP done.

Net still empty 6 on 5.

1 to go and the Amerks miss the net for the 4th time.

Boucher a good shot, but stopped.

:20 to go and this one is all over but the crying.
Comets lose 3-1, not scoring after the first 2 minutes.

SOG:
Comets 8 10 12 = 30
Amerks 12 16 6 = 34

PP
Comets 0/1
Amerks 1/1

3 Stars

1st - C.J. Smith (Rochester) 1G/1A
2nd - Linus Ullmark (Rochester) 29/30
3rd - Stuart Percy (Rochester) 1G-GWG
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megaterio Llamas

Get North

Registered User
Aug 25, 2013
8,472
1,364
B.C.
Let me address this one more time. My quibble has been that Benning does not care about stocking his farm because he does not assign any real serious prospects for development there in the first place. I listed the 4 actual prospects that Benning really saw as Canucks. 2 are there. One will be when either the Nilsson contract runs out or Benning trades one of his keepers to make room. I think that would be a mistake, but I have no say. The 4th may never actually get there. Go to the post if you can't remember who they are.

The rest are marginal players at best and isn't really expecting to put them on the roster anyways, but they help ice a team in Utica. He then acquires whatever seems to be left over after all the other teams who want top players have loaded up their AHL rosters. Then he sends the guys he wants back as soon as possible to Utica. That number has been minuscule to say the least, but Goldobin was the latest. GM Johnson said he was here to iron out a couple things and when he went back up, he didn't want to see him here again. That's not a player acquired for the farm.

You also mention Rodin. Benning had already written him off and hoped as a last gasp he might be able to find himself. Cull had every opportunity to insert him into game day lineups and did not. When he did Rodin didn't look all that. Duh! He hadn't actually played more than a handful of games in more than 2 years and was rehabbing major constructive knee surgery. Result? Rodin saw the writing on the wall as to where he fit into Vancouver's plans and asked out. Ask yourself what the feelings in Europe are about this management team after Tryamkin and Rodin walked out. Add to that Dahlen who spent a few days in Utica and then also took off back to Sweden. They are not the first ones with the European out clause either. Then you have a guy like Tommernes who asked out during the '14-15 season. Andersson, who was top 4 D, signed a contract to go back home before the season even ended and that doesn't count the long playoff run he was instrumental in. He never even condidered negotiating a RFA contract. Cederholm went back home after 2 seasons with a yerar still remaining on his ELC. He came back this season to rid himself of Vancouver (not that he'll be a big loss.

Archi is a given although being the Canucks very last cut following the year he put up in 2016-17 (Top point getter for the Comets and setting a single season record for Goals scored by a Comet probably earned him a t least a 2-way so he would be available for a call-up. You have to be honest and recognize he is better than some on that roster right now and actually before the injuries. His injury has really hurt the team.

Boucher I do believe was sent here because Benning no longer sees him in the future plans of Vancouver. His goal total right now backs me up, #2 in the AHL.

Your claim as to the center group is ridiculous. Gaunce was a Canuck until he played himself off the roster. The fact thta he is still in Vancouver and Boucher is down here says it all. He came to Utica on a conditioning stint and he's been in Vancouver since it ran out. He was never targeted for Utica by anyone but HF posters.

Cassels was flat out terrible last season and the one before. Anyone who believed he could be a good center for Utica was on some very good drugs.

Hamilton has one saving grace. he is good on faceoffs. He was used in that role in almost every crucial faceoff during the '15-16 layoff run and taht included almost every defensive zone faceoff and would be replaced as soon as the puck cleared the zone. Usually it was Conacher that would come on because his line was the main unit used for defensive zone faceoffs. After that he is only good as a 4th line center when he has 2 brilliantly effective forechecking wings, a la Bancks and Zalewski, so he can shadow the forecheck and pick up the pucks that squirt free of the battles or desperation passes from guys succumbing to the pressure. He hasn't had that luxury the past 2 seasons and thus is very ineffective leading to his becoming the team's #1 penalty taker. During his injury LaBate has become the new leader because he is being aligned against better skaters and he has to hook, trip, and slash to prevent their offense. This is exactly what happened to Wacey. So no he is not a solid AHL center in the lines of what the Comets are missing.

That leaves Chaput who is good choice, except not when he is the only play maker on the team to begin with, knowing you are probably going to have to call him up. There has to be someone competent enough as the #2 center who can pick up some of the slack when he's gone. That's management 101. That guy was not acquired last season when Chaput spent all but the 1st 10 games in Vancouver, nor this season when the Comets were left with Bancks (a checking wing), Darcy (a prayer making the roster who Is no where near a competent play making #1/2 center), Cassels, ECHL call-up Moynihan, ECHL loaner Brassart, and now Hamilton and Woods (AHL bottom 6er) both coming off injuries. That also includes the 2015-16 season when FRIESEN had to be used as the #1 center (the following year he signed with AHL Chicago on an AHL contract, put up 12 pts in 76 GP and is now in Europe). There are no play making centers in Utica once again. It took 21 games this year. The guys being used by the Comets would not be adequate AHL centers above the 4th line on any team in this league and that's why they are here. Bancks could play bottom six energy line for other teams.Maybe Darcy who was with Kalamazoo before making the Comets roster could catch with a couple teams, but he is not a prototypical bottom 6 player and not strong enough to fill a top 6 role, so it would have to be a team really in need of some experience. The rest belong in a 4th line role or the ECHL.

Tyhee explained completely where you have gone astray with Hensick, O'Reilly, Acton, and Friesen. I added a little more for you on him. Here's some more. He filled a good role for the Comets when he was used properly as a 3rd line center. His use as as a 2nd line center between Baertschi and Conacher was due to the lack of no one else and like Bancks between Goldobin and Boucher he picked up some points by getting them the puck and then hanging back to protect when they got caught turning it over and the other team got out trapping them behind.

Finally, let me address your "Top 4" D-men. Let me start by saying at best Wiercioch might be a top 2 D-man if paired with the the right top 2 partner. The other 3 are not.

In '13-14, the Comets didn't have a #1 D, a puck mover, strong defensively, with an offensive edge. They (Henning) picked up a veteran defensive gem in ex-NHL Stanley Cup winning Kent Huskins. He was the heart and sole of the Comets in their own end for 2 seasons including the '15-16 playoff run. He set the bar for how you should play in your own end and no Comet has come close to his on ice presence, his calm and coolheadedness under pressure, how to protect the front of your crease and play D away from the puck, thus the examples he set by how he played, his on ice instructions to his partner, and the info he shared with the kids on the bench and in practice. He was an on ice coach, a strong locker room presence, etc. If Benning thinks a player can mentor the kids, this guy was the example and he should want one like him in Utica every season. He was irreplaceable and it's shown since he retired. Nobody close has been a Comet since.

A tp 2 D-man has to have some basic qualities. He needs to be able to move the puck up ice quickly either by skating it out of trouble, making a quick accurate, tape to tape breakout pas anywhere from 10-20 feet all the way to the long stretch pass, or if all else fails simply get it out of the zone without icing it and live to fight another day. Being able to carry the puck up ice leading the rush or quiclkly joining the rush after the break out pass is also a common trait. Defensively he is lights out 1 0n 1, doesn't get walked, wins the majority of his puck battles, doesn't wilt under pressure and can continue to work the puck along the boards until a mate becomes available to help or he can personally boost the puck from danger. In front he can tie up defenders if he can't deny them the puck to begin with and is very aware of the correct positioning away from the puck to prevent the naked back door forward or the off side D-man streaking in from the point collecting easy back side tap ins. We do not have one of those guys on this roster.

The fact is that every single D-man that has played a game here has been weak vs a strong forecheck. That just can't be as it a fundamental need of any D-man to withstand that kind of pressure. They are also weak vs a strong offesnive presence in front. They ahve all forgotten men on the back door and the opposition has scored quite easily in those situations. They have also lost their position and allowed players to receive clean passes in both the high and low slot or right in the crease. Many goals have been scored in just these circumstances. Thye have also been guilty of puck watching when the Offense has gained possession an nd moved the puck rapidly around the perimeter until one of them just steps into the open for a pass and shot or the worst , one of those guys just takes the puck unchallenged right to the net for a great chance , but often a goal. That strong guy dominating space in front of the net has been responsible for several tip in goals or massive screens that also end up in the net. This D corps has been very ugly on many occasions and complete chaos is often the result of strong offensive forecheck that turns into heavy offensive pressure sometimes resembling a shooting gallery. None of the Comets inn these situations is able to even touch the puck and if they do are totally inept in their panic to clear the zone and it just starts up all over again.

Holm is a 26 yr-old 6th yr pro. He spent his 21 and 22 yr-old seasons in nthe Swedish minors. That is not a good sign right off the bat. He then graduated to the SHL for the next 3 seasons. His pt totals were very impressive. Let's assume he was a Candian Jr for 3 seasons and then went to the AHL for the next 2. 13, 7, 9, and finally 21 in full seasons of play. This was not a highly sought after Swedish pro. Highly sought after Swedes are not 26. He had settled into a decnt role with the Comets, but I would call him a 3'4 guy after watching him until he was hurt. He can get the puck up ice and passes well as long as he isn't under duress. Very weak in front, a stick checker, little body work. His point total is misleading. In many instances he has stood in the middle of the blue line, taken wide open passes from forwards, and then simply moved it unchallenged to the half boards where either Goldobin or Boucher did the work to produce a goal upon which he picked up the 3rd point.

Sifers is a 34-yr old vet who is losing his legs. He is a defensive specialist whose best days were 2008-09 and 2009-10 when he got 37 total games in the NHL with 2 teams, Leafs (23) and Wild (14). He is a great #5 to help ease the two rookies into the pro game. The Comets were so ill equipped and over laden with vets that the kids were automatic starters. As the injuries have taken place they are moving up the chain whether they are actually ready for that load or not. Wiercioch has been getting 30 minutes a game and has been on the ice for a load of goals paired with Brisebois, Chatfield, Cederholm, Stewart, and Sautner. It doesn't matter his partner though his most common partner is Cahtfield.

McEneny is the guy I feel sorriest for. He had become a solid 3-4 D-man and had been coming on strong at the end of last seson. he seemed to regress alittle, but was paired with his most common partner last season in Subban. Now he's gone for the season.

Holm is a who knows with a concussion and Sifers is casted with a broken wrist.

The D is a catastrophe out of anyone's hands, but hs is the time astute GMs (AHL and NHL) find a guy still sitting on the outside or playing with another team on an PTO like Robak was last year.

Let me just say the Robak, Fedun, Sanguinetti and Biega are top 4 before any of the guys you named. Benning stopped looking for one of those after the 15-16 season when Fedun was here.

I have nothing more to say on this and will agree to disagree if you want to take it further.
I'm just going to say a few things on your reoccurring points.

I think your speculation on Benning is wrong and I think you may be right on a couple things, but I think you're dead wrong on some others.

You said Benning puts players in the AHL who he doesn't think have a future on the Canucks. You used Reid Boucher because you don't think he has a future with the Canucks. My response is, I hope you're right because I don't want Boucher anywhere near my NHL roster. I disagree with the overall point you're trying to make though, mostly because your proof is probably the fact that Stecher and Hutton started in the NHL, or the Dahlen/Tryamkin situations. Well Stecher and Hutton were ready for the NHL and even though they don't look like as good as they projected to be, they are still NHL level defensemen. Dahlen and Tryamkin are not the only players who play overseas over the AHL. I can provide you many examples of players who stay home. Goldobin is someone Benning doesn't see a future with?

We'll see how this season continues to play out. IMO, Benning definitely thinks about Utica if he hires someone responsible for it like Ryan Johnson, and the signings in the off-season to bolster a Utica team. The signings might not be perfect, but my point is he has his mind on Utica.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817

A rare failed #2 draft of the Lightning. Played for Syracuse the past 3 seasons, but only 23 GP last season. have to wonder if his game fell off the earth or if he was seriously injured.

Having started this season in the ECHL with the Winnipeg Jets/Manitoba Moose affiliate does not speak well for where his game is at.

Cull has to know him and that has to be the major impetus in this tryout. He has to have seen enough of what the Canucks could give him from the Zoo. Don't know who came up with Watson or Faust. I haven't seen Watson play a game yet. His 3 GP have all been on the road in the last 3 games all played on the road.
With only 21 GP in his pro career and all for the ECHL Grizzlies I don't think even Cull could be patient enough to wait for Holm or Sifers to come back. If he can at least be better than ceder either Holm, he offers better help when Sifers or Holm does return and can pair up with Cederholm until then.
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
I'm just going to say a few things on your reoccurring points.

I think your speculation on Benning is wrong and I think you may be right on a couple things, but I think you're dead wrong on some others.

You said Benning puts players in the AHL who he doesn't think have a future on the Canucks. You used Reid Boucher because you don't think he has a future with the Canucks. My response is, I hope you're right because I don't want Boucher anywhere near my NHL roster. I disagree with the overall point you're trying to make though, mostly because your proof is probably the fact that Stecher and Hutton started in the NHL, or the Dahlen/Tryamkin situations. Well Stecher and Hutton were ready for the NHL and even though they don't look like as good as they projected to be, they are still NHL level defensemen. Dahlen and Tryamkin are not the only players who play overseas over the AHL. I can provide you many examples of players who stay home.

Goldobin is someone Benning doesn't see a future with?

We'll see how this season continues to play out. IMO, Benning definitely thinks about Utica if he hires someone responsible for it like Ryan Johnson, and the signings in the off-season to bolster a Utica team. The signings might not be perfect, but my point is he has his mind on Utica.

Last word!
Can you read? I listed Goldobin as one of the guys he WANTED in Vancouver ASAP. He was a big deal at the TDL and Benning always wants his acquisitions in the lineup to prove he did good if it's at all possible. He was only supposed to be here for a short stint to work on playing in his own zone and making use of other players. Thus, he was never a plan for the Comets. His stay here was similar to a conditioning stint.

I know Stecher and Hutton started in the NHL making clear my point that Benning will get any high prospect he can onto the Vancouver roster so what he sends to Utica is really not counted on by him to ever get to Vancouver in the first place. What prospect has begun their career as a Comet and developed into a Canuck besides Gaunce?He worked his ass into the lineup and has played well enough for 2 different coaches to see value in him in the bottom 6. That wasn't Benning's idea.

Jake was a Vancouver Mistake. he was given too much too soon and was not looking good at all, in year 2. So when he was sent down he became a victim of the Benning negligence because as Benning admitted the Comets didn't have any playmaking centers and that was hurting Jake. Duh! Just who was responsible for there being no playmaking centers in Utica? If you tell me anyone but Benning, you lose all credibility with me from here on out.

Contrary to your opinion there was only one here this year and like last year he is back in Vancouver. We will see just how long the number of Canucks who can play center in Vancouver remain there with none being sent to the Comets.

I won't waste my time on the European issue. I've exhausted myself on that issue. I predicted they would all be in Europe before they ever came to NA and they are including Tryamkin. if you give them the out clause only as fool would refuse it. If you want to negotiate to go back and the parent club sees it as a good thing because you can't help the AHL team anyways that's different. That's how many clubs are handling that issue right now. There a lot of young Europeans starring in the AHL right now and the past few years. It's not uncommon for them to start here at 18 or 19either, 1 to 2 years sooner than a Canadian jr can. That gives the good ones a head start on the pro game and makes them better NHL players sooner. I don't care. Those prospects are not under my watch. I don't need my rebuild to get its *** going as strong and quickly as possible. I'm not signing poor UFAs to multi year contracts instead of trying to get my really good stars jump started in the North American game. The Canucks fan base and higher ups have an issue with Russian while the Blues and especially the Lightning are flourishing with them and their farms are flush with them as well. I don't see them working out deals to avoid the AHL. The Marlies have an 18 yr old swede playing very well for them right now as well. the Nylanders both started in the AHL at 18. I know there are many in Europe, but there are many in NA as well and Benning deosn't seem to even try to keep any of them here. Those HE has kept have left not so impressed with his treatment al a Tryamkin, Rodin, Tommernes, Andersson, Dahlen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadian Club

Get North

Registered User
Aug 25, 2013
8,472
1,364
B.C.
Last word!
Can you read? I listed Goldobin as one of the guys he WANTED in Vancouver ASAP. He was a big deal at the TDL and Benning always wants his acquisitions in the lineup to prove he did good if it's at all possible. He was only supposed to be here for a short stint to work on playing in his own zone and making use of other players. Thus, he was never a plan for the Comets. His stay here was similar to a conditioning stint.

I know Stecher and Hutton started in the NHL making clear my point that Benning will get any high prospect he can onto the Vancouver roster so what he sends to Utica is really not counted on by him to ever get to Vancouver in the first place. What prospect has begun their career as a Comet and developed into a Canuck besides Gaunce?He worked his ass into the lineup and has played well enough for 2 different coaches to see value in him in the bottom 6. That wasn't Benning's idea.

Jake was a Vancouver Mistake. he was given too much too soon and was not looking good at all, in year 2. So when he was sent down he became a victim of the Benning negligence because as Benning admitted the Comets didn't have any playmaking centers and that was hurting Jake. Duh! Just who was responsible for there being no playmaking centers in Utica? If you tell me anyone but Benning, you lose all credibility with me from here on out.

Contrary to your opinion there was only one here this year and like last year he is back in Vancouver. We will see just how long the number of Canucks who can play center in Vancouver remain there with none being sent to the Comets.

I won't waste my time on the European issue. I've exhausted myself on that issue. I predicted they would all be in Europe before they ever came to NA and they are including Tryamkin. if you give them the out clause only as fool would refuse it. If you want to negotiate to go back and the parent club sees it as a good thing because you can't help the AHL team anyways that's different. That's how many clubs are handling that issue right now. There a lot of young Europeans starring in the AHL right now and the past few years. It's not uncommon for them to start here at 18 or 19either, 1 to 2 years sooner than a Canadian jr can. That gives the good ones a head start on the pro game and makes them better NHL players sooner. I don't care. Those prospects are not under my watch. I don't need my rebuild to get its *** going as strong and quickly as possible. I'm not signing poor UFAs to multi year contracts instead of trying to get my really good stars jump started in the North American game. The Canucks fan base and higher ups have an issue with Russian while the Blues and especially the Lightning are flourishing with them and their farms are flush with them as well. I don't see them working out deals to avoid the AHL. The Marlies have an 18 yr old swede playing very well for them right now as well. the Nylanders both started in the AHL at 18. I know there are many in Europe, but there are many in NA as well and Benning deosn't seem to even try to keep any of them here. Those HE has kept have left not so impressed with his treatment al a Tryamkin, Rodin, Tommernes, Andersson, Dahlen.
Bolded is too ridiculous, but I guess anything is possible.

The European issue is created by other GMs, players would rather stay at home and play big minutes on a men team than playing in the AHL. Once it starts by whichever GM, then other players will demand that as well.

I'm done arguing though, I see where you stand.
 

tyhee

Registered User
Feb 5, 2015
2,563
2,645
In the Canucks Army report on the 3-1 loss Dec 13 against the Rochester Americans, Corey Hergott wrote the following:

"Cassels had a nice chance at the side of the net but wasn’t able to stuff the puck past Ullmark. I’d have to say that this was one of Cole’s better games of the season. Playing him with Wacey Hamilton seems to have lit a bit of a spark in the oft-injured centerman. His defensive game is pretty sound, maybe if he can finally stay healthy, and pick up a few things from Hamilton along the way, there might be a 4th liner/13th forward in there yet."

Later he named Cassels the first Comets star of the game and wrote about that:

"1st Star: Cole Cassels. I know, maybe Thatcher Demko should be on this list after making 31 saves, and a few of them of the “big” variety, but I thought that Cole stood out enough today to warrant some praise. Cassels had another hard working game today. He picked up an assist on the Carcone goal, and he put four shots on the Rochester net. What Cassels does on the ice won’t likely bring him the glory that scoring piles of goals would, however, what he does bring will earn him the trust of his coaching staff to be out late in games protecting a lead as well as picking up some shut down minutes against opponents better players. Cassels seems to be thriving with Wacey Hamilton on his left side; perhaps he’s picking up a few pointers from the veteran player along the way." CanucksArmy Utica Comets Post-Game: Comets Fall 3-1 To Rochester To End Road Trip

I know that suggesting he could be a 4th liner/13th forward isn't high praise, but he also said Cassels' defensive game is pretty sound, had "another" hard working game and that what he does will earn the trust of his coaching staff and pick him up some shut down minutes and that Cassels seems to be thriving playing with Hamilton.

Could a few of the people that have been watching Cassels comment? I've differed with Hergott's analysis in the past and take his opinions with a grain of salt, but wonder if I've missed something and Cassels has been better than what I'd understood.

Thanks.
 

orcatown

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2003
10,271
7,541
Visit site
Watched the game and to call Cassels first star is IMO ridiculous. On several occasions got walked in his own zone for open chances. Also got bounced to the ice continually. He did try to come around the net a few times and got flattened. When the play got moved from the Amerks end back toward the Utica end you could see Cassels with his head down trying all out to get back in the play and still falling behind. He is far from thriving with anyone. He is indeed slow and light on his skates. He is easily pushed out of the play and has no offensive presence. At this point (19 games in) he has no goals and 2 assists. (and 8 goals in about 150 AHL games) To see him or Hamilton having good seasons is mind boggling. In this game, when the Comets were trying to get back in the game, Cassels was little used with player like Darcy and Boucher getting double shifted.

Really it is painful to see how some like this Hergott guy and people on CDC try to see Cassels as they want or him suppose him to be (the guy that shut down McDavid!!!!) and not recognize the player he actually is.

The continual excuses for Cassels (his injuries), the exaggeration of his all round play or his defensive play and projection of him as this potential decent 3rd line NHL player is nonsense IMO. People just look to see what they want to see.

In the game tonight

Cull juggles the lines a lot to try and get some goals. Boucher had some great chances but just couldn't bury the puck in this game. To me, he was again the best forward by a bit.
Thought he played a much more physical game and really engaged that way. Boucher looks a lot sturdier than last year. Carcone had strong start to the game and if the Cassels - Hamilton - Carcone line was doing anything it was chiefly a result of the individual play of Carcone. Outside of those didn't think anyone stood out much among the forwards

Overall the Amerks dominated and Comets were tied up in their own zone for long periods of the game. Demko played well to keep the thing close. Counted 12 point blank saves he made.

Did not like McEwen very much. Spun out of control at times illustrating skating remains an issue. Not really managing the puck well.

On defense Chatfield had fairly good game and Brisebois was better. Still they got tied up too much in their own end. Have to blame the forwards and particularly the centers for much of this however.
 

go comets

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
3,532
1,471
In the Canucks Army report on the 3-1 loss Dec 13 against the Rochester Americans, Corey Hergott wrote the following:

"Cassels had a nice chance at the side of the net but wasn’t able to stuff the puck past Ullmark. I’d have to say that this was one of Cole’s better games of the season. Playing him with Wacey Hamilton seems to have lit a bit of a spark in the oft-injured centerman. His defensive game is pretty sound, maybe if he can finally stay healthy, and pick up a few things from Hamilton along the way, there might be a 4th liner/13th forward in there yet."

Later he named Cassels the first Comets star of the game and wrote about that:

"1st Star: Cole Cassels. I know, maybe Thatcher Demko should be on this list after making 31 saves, and a few of them of the “big” variety, but I thought that Cole stood out enough today to warrant some praise. Cassels had another hard working game today. He picked up an assist on the Carcone goal, and he put four shots on the Rochester net. What Cassels does on the ice won’t likely bring him the glory that scoring piles of goals would, however, what he does bring will earn him the trust of his coaching staff to be out late in games protecting a lead as well as picking up some shut down minutes against opponents better players. Cassels seems to be thriving with Wacey Hamilton on his left side; perhaps he’s picking up a few pointers from the veteran player along the way." CanucksArmy Utica Comets Post-Game: Comets Fall 3-1 To Rochester To End Road Trip

I know that suggesting he could be a 4th liner/13th forward isn't high praise, but he also said Cassels' defensive game is pretty sound, had "another" hard working game and that what he does will earn the trust of his coaching staff and pick him up some shut down minutes and that Cassels seems to be thriving playing with Hamilton.

Could a few of the people that have been watching Cassels comment? I've differed with Hergott's analysis in the past and take his opinions with a grain of salt, but wonder if I've missed something and Cassels has been better than what I'd understood.

Thanks.

I've watched Cassels for the third season now and I can honestly say that Cassels has a better chance of getting pregnant than he does of being a #1 center in the AHL or being named the first star of a game.......

Never gonna happen,no way , no how..
 

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
I can't say any more on the real Cassels than the 2 previous posters. That pretty much wraps it up.

If he is extended next year it will prove the theory I have that Benning doesn't care who plays in Utica as long as he fills the slots so the couple guys he stashes here for call-ups will have a team to play on so they can be game ready when called upon. He will only fix that if he has to assign a real serious prospect and that kid will get some help. Can only hold out for Lind and Gadjovich.

Right now MacEwen's play doesn't show he is one of those prized few. He has been given little to work with. Chatfield on the other hand always gets a vet D-man. It's been Wiercioch since he got here. Brisebois gets Sautner, not nearly the same thing. Both need the cover guy and Sautner needs one himself.
 
Last edited:

Bad Goalie

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
20,094
8,817
I posted this last night on the Canucks postgame thread. It fits here as well.

If Tanev is out again and Wiercioch is called up, Sauntner will become the Sr D-man with Chatfield and Brisebois, rookies having their share of troubles, inking in at #s 2 and 3.

Swedish reclamation project Cederholm called up from the ECHL at #4.

PTO Cliff Watson, in his first pro season with 21 GP under his belt with the Utah Grizzlies as his only pro experience, has played the last 3 games for the Comets already because Mackenze Stewart did a perfect impression of a turnstile when Cull attempted to give him a go.

They just signed former AHL Syracuse Crunch D-man Dylan Blujus to a PTO out of ECHL Jacksonville. The announcement wasn't even made on the Utica site and I doubt he was in Rochester tonight. Likely joins the team at the Aud tomorrow morning. The down side here is that while he is only a 4th year pro, after 2 and part of a 3rd season with the Crunch he was let go and landed in the ECHL this season. He is a former Tampa Bay 2nd round Draft pick who looks to have flat out busted on his ***. That will make 6 D-men with Stewart in reserve.

So it's Sautner and not Wiercioch.Everything remains the same except Sautner is traded out for Wiercioch. Is this D-corps anywhere near the amazing strong D defense thew Comets were supposed to have this season? The original best 6 had all kinds of problems. This group is utterly frightening. Glad I don't have to try and backstop them and be held responsible by the fan base when the floodgates open.
 
Last edited:

UticaHockey

Registered User
Feb 27, 2013
3,428
2,321
Utica, NY
is everyone hurt down in the Utica right now that we are calling up Ashton Sautner?
Holm and McEneny are both hurt. Wierchioch has spent 29 of the 30 days allowed on a NHL roster without needing to pass through waivers to be sent down again. Chatfield and Brisebois are both first year pros that need to be playing instead of eating popcorn in Vancouver. So it is Sautner that get's popcorn duty this time. The only other available option on a NHL contract is MacKenzie Stewart and I don't think they want to go there just on the possibility that an illness strikes another dman and the popcorn guy has to be penciled in at the last minute.
 

go comets

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
3,532
1,471


somewhere BG's blood is boiling...

Sautner has improved this year, but he did have that bad concussion last season which made him very shy in games........

I'm happy for him......

Any more callups and the comets will be pulling people out of the stands....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad