Iron Balls McGinty
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2005
- 8,639
- 6,510
I don't know anything about him.So no for Smith also?
You can’t go for ”safe” prospect in this franchise changing draft.
I don't know anything about him.So no for Smith also?
You can’t go for ”safe” prospect in this franchise changing draft.
Hes in a hurry or he just doesnt like the job Larsen did with what he had. It was a terrible lineup for most of the year but not 31st in the NHL bad. I think it tells us he was a more veteran coach to get things going the other direction and a new voice. If the pick is 4 those guys wont be ready much sooner than Michkov would come over anyway. Well unless you want another Sillinger situationHe's certainly not a better prospect than the one who's # is hanging in the rafters.
Yes, I know that for sure.
1. He doesn't fit the timeline. If the firing of Larson tells us anything, the front office is in a hurry. 2. Russian factor. Best case scenario he arrives in three years. What if he gets drafted into a war?
3. He's a winger and we have plenty of wingers.
Look not trying to sound condescending but a lot of people talk about him being the messiah. I was just tired of hearing people retreading headlines and stats without going further than formulating a thought for themselves. The same as people say Columbus as a city sucks.I've followed his career since he was 15.
How about you stop being so aggresively condescending. Extremely arrogant comment to make about a subject that is under heavy debate across the entire scouting community. As if you have a crystal ball and everyone else is stupid
He has two years (maybe less) to get this fixed. I'm just not sure how many more times this needs to be said.Hes in a hurry or he just doesnt like the job Larsen did with what he had. It was a terrible lineup for most of the year but not 31st in the NHL bad. I think it tells us he was a more veteran coach to get things going the other direction and a new voice. If the pick is 4 those guys wont be ready much sooner than Michkov would come over anyway. Well unless you want another Sillinger situation
He's certainly not a better prospect than the one who's # is hanging in the rafters.
Yes, I know that for sure.
1. He doesn't fit the timeline. If the firing of Larson tells us anything, the front office is in a hurry. 2. Russian factor. Best case scenario he arrives in three years. What if he gets drafted into a war?
3. He's a winger and we have plenty of wingers.
I don't know anything about him.
Hes in a hurry or he just doesnt like the job Larsen did with what he had. It was a terrible lineup for most of the year but not 31st in the NHL bad. I think it tells us he was a more veteran coach to get things going the other direction and a new voice. If the pick is 4 those guys wont be ready much sooner than Michkov would come over anyway. Well unless you want another Sillinger situation
Comments from Jarmo tells me he’s done building the pipeline after he adds this blue chip center (hopefully top 3 guy).
I think they are gonna bring in a lot of vets to help turn this thing around.
I expect to add a:
Vet coach.
Vet top 6 center.
Vet top 4 left defense.
Vet goalie.
Im not sure its useless if its a guy like Backlund. He can play anywhere and great option if injuries occur again. If he sticks around into the future he could easily be a matchup center behind the top linesVeteran coach is a must for next hire.
Someone who can help the kids to take the next step and become a legit playoff team.
Rookie coach is an absolute no no
If they land a top3 pick that vet C becomes ”useless.
Should just buy more grit to offense and go all in for defense
I still think we might need another vet C, but it really depends on how they feel about Jenner's back.. he's not getting younger and he's had previous issue and that's not something that goes away and actually will only get worse over the next 2--5 years. Imagine we go into next season thinking we're solid down the middle and Jenner gets hurt. As good as Fantilli and Carlson might be, it could be a bad idea to go into next season with some combo of KJ, top3 pick, Roslovic, Kuraly, VoronkovVeteran coach is a must for next hire.
Someone who can help the kids to take the next step and become a legit playoff team.
Rookie coach is an absolute no no
If they land a top3 pick that vet C becomes ”useless.
Should just buy more grit to offense and go all in for defense
Im not sure its useless if its a guy like Backlund. He can play anywhere and great option if injuries occur again. If he sticks around into the future he could easily be a matchup center behind the top lines
I still think we might need another vet C, but it really depends on how they feel about Jenner's back.. he's not getting younger and he's had previous issue and that's not something that goes away and actually will only get worse over the next 2--5 years. Imagine we go into next season thinking we're solid down the middle and Jenner gets hurt. As good as Fantilli and Carlson might be, it could be a bad idea to go into next season with some combo of KJ, top3 pick, Roslovic, Kuraly, Voronkov
Another wildcard... How serious is Laine/FO at realistically switching to C? If he can actually make that jump that restructures our lineup significantly. I feel like it's a reach even talking about it since it was such a small sample size but he really did look good in the middle. As much as I don't think it's gonna happen, part of me thinks Jarmo (or maybe it's just me) can't help but want him to make the change. Imagine we trade away PLD for a winger in Laine only to convert him to ab effective 1/2C?
This organization can't afford to think an 18yo kid is going to be a favor in a year. It's going to take 2-3 years for these picks to dominate and be effective top 6 players. We keep forgetting that.This organization can't afford to wait 3 years on a top 5 pick right now. We've waited long enough. They need to start winning soon.
I agree I don't think we need to make a huge splash just someone who can (hopefully) stay healthy, contribute defensively and offensively and not be a liability both on the ice and in the dot.Backlund sure, he just made it sure he wants to compete for a Cup.
But I really wish they hope/see Johnson as a C and don’t add a C and push him to W
Veteran C yes.
But if they get a top3 pick it shouldn’t be a top6 C.
Rather go all in on defense and allow Jenner to break in either Fantilli or Carlsson& run Johnson with Gaudreau and Marchenko
Gaudreau- Johnson- Marchenko
Jenner- Fantilli- Laine
Thats just 1 example. I dont think anyone wants to be in a situation where 1 injury completely guts the center position. We do need a 3C. Im hoping they move on from Roslovic but I dont know who would want him. Maybe a new coach gets him going but even then I feel like maybe you get a good season in a contract year and then back to the same old Roslovic.Backlund sure, he just made it sure he wants to compete for a Cup.
But I really wish they hope/see Johnson as a C and don’t add a C and push him to W
Veteran C yes.
But if they get a top3 pick it shouldn’t be a top6 C.
Rather go all in on defense and allow Jenner to break in either Fantilli or Carlsson& run Johnson with Gaudreau and Marchenko
Gaudreau- Johnson- Marchenko
Jenner- Fantilli- Laine
Comments from Jarmo tells me he’s done building the pipeline after he adds this blue chip center (hopefully top 3 guy).
I think they are gonna bring in a lot of vets to help turn this thing around.
I expect to add a:
Vet coach.
Vet top 6 center.
Vet top 4 left defense.
Vet goalie.
If they land a top3 pick that vet C becomes ”useless.
Should just buy more grit to offense and go all in for defense
And who do you have playing next to Werenski the next year or 2??
If Bedard is half the player he's supposed to be, he's ready to make an impact next season already. The top-3 were supposed to be franchise altering talents, if that prediction is as sure as people make it sound, then they will be good players out the gate. If they are not, then how can you be sure they will be in 2 or 3 years since even pro scouts seem to struggle to predict that far with 17-18 year olds?