One of the stupidest theories as to why Alfie left is that he took a pay cut and was supposed to make it on his next contract but was denied it. This same theory was wrongfully also applied to turris negotiations early this season.
Some people really don't understand the business side of the game.
Theory?
"When I did my last contract for four years ending in the [2012-13] season, I was asked to help the team manage the salary cap by adding on an extra year to my contract," he said. "I agreed. Each side fully expected I would retire and not play the 2012-13 season. However, after the 2012 season, I told the Sens I wanted to play another season. I also asked that we look at a possible extension for this upcoming season, at a fair amount, to balance out the two years for both of us. [The Senators] agreed.
"Sadly, the contract negotiations went nowhere, but I played out the season as I had promised. In late June, I decided I had it in me to play at least one more season. I told management that I was willing to return, and I reminded them of our agreement from the year before. But, to my disappointment, negotiations again quickly stalled."
Alfredsson: Contract impasse led to Ottawa departure
Literally stated by Alfie right there
Also, when was that ever said about Turris? He signed a long-term deal 5 years ago before he was solidified as a top 6 guy, pretty sure that's completely made up; no one said he was owed money.....signed to a discount deal, sure, but that is completely irrelevant.