So Ive heard a theory a few times in the past couple days that Babcock has purposely changed the entire style of play of the team because of our somewhat stable position in the standings, to experiment with some new stuff and try and teach. Hockey people are saying this, not just randoms.
So Ive heard a theory a few times in the past couple days that Babcock has purposely changed the entire style of play of the team because of our somewhat stable position in the standings, to experiment with some new stuff and try and teach. Hockey people are saying this, not just randoms.
So Ive heard a theory a few times in the past couple days that Babcock has purposely changed the entire style of play of the team because of our somewhat stable position in the standings, to experiment with some new stuff and try and teach. Hockey people are saying this, not just randoms.
At this point of the season, I hope we trade Komarov, and aquire a solid D-man.
Trade Away: Komarov, Leivo, Carrick for multiple picks
Aquire: Quality RHD
what quality/solid defenseman are you going to get for those three players?
We can use picks/prospects as well... I'm thinking a Hainsey type acquisition would be perfect. Last season Pittsburgh got Hainsey for 2nd round pick (+ dumped a contract).
no that was fair, i was just double checking like you mean just a serviceable defenseman, not like. someone posh
A team like Arizona might have an interest in someone like Carrick.
Question is how injured is Hjalmarsson and what would it cost to get him?
Might take a premium but Coyotes don't look like they are going anywhere for the next couple years anyway.
IMO they'd have no interest in rentals, and I'm not sure the Leafs have any interest in moving rentals.
Carrick, pick(s) and prospect(s) ...
The Leafs should have interest in Connor Carrick. No point in trading him unless its a clear cut top 4 under contract for some time.
Can you post some proof of people suggesting Babcock could do no wrong or are you just pulling this out of your magic hat?Remember when Babcock could do no wrong because we were near the top of the league? That went well
I don't want to drag up old posts to shame specific people. Most people who follow this board know I'm right, and that we had people saying we couldn't complain since Babcock had us winning gamesCan you post some proof of people suggesting Babcock could do no wrong or are you just pulling this out of your magic hat?
Sure.I don't want to drag up old posts to shame specific people. Most people who follow this board know I'm right, and that we had people saying we couldn't complain since Babcock had us winning games