There's no question his offensive production is low relative to his ice time.
This is also a point the media raise with respect to the line of Granlund-Sutter-Dorsett.
From my point of view, as long as these guys can keep playing other teams' best lines to a near standstill, I'm satisfied to see them out there against those lines, even though it means they play more than players who have more offensive (and probably overall) ability.
Just don't bother. In one thread, he argues that Corsi is the everything, in the next it's - his Qot is too high (playing with Dorsett and Sutter whom he says are rubbish in other threads) and QoC is low (while matching up against the top lines in the league). When his Corsi is good (team leading) - its his G/60 and P/60 that are the problem. In another thread he argue that you always have to consider salary cap. He just cherry picks analytics to support the same conclusion no matter what.
It's been said that statistics are like a lamp post - you can use them for support OR illumination. Or just watch the game.
Yes, many people suggested that, if he were healthy and deployed in offensive situations he could easily improve on his production from last year. But he is being deployed in a shut down checking role. His line has been matched against McDavid/Draisaitl, Eichel/Kane, Laine/Ehlers and Scheifele/Wheeler, Ovechkin/Kuznetsov, Seguin/Benn, etc. and come out on top of the match ups. So given that, is it really that difficult to understand why his offensive production is off?
If Granlund scored 5 goals next game there are 2 things you could count on. 1) Safeway would cancel the Score and Win contest and 2) Pauser/Y2K would say his shooting percentage is unsustainable.