Speculation: The 2022 NHL Trade Deadline Thread | March 21st | 3:00 pm ET

Flat Ronnie

Registered User
Feb 11, 2014
5,600
2,985
Wait, wait...so what is our lineup supposed to look like now?

3rd line is: Hagel - Nash - Paul?
 

Felonious Python

Minor League Degenerate
Aug 20, 2004
30,820
8,924

Weekes hasn't Tweeted about this, and I've got the Sportsnet stream up. He's on ESPN. Anyone been watching that?
 

Zwui21

Registered User
Aug 31, 2019
2,246
2,829
Wait, wait...so what is our lineup supposed to look like now?

3rd line is: Hagel - Nash - Ryan?
Nah Nash gotta be the depth guy in case someone gets hurt.
But wonder how tf we can fit Nash in our cap situation
 

JTBF81

Registered User
Dec 6, 2018
4,019
2,129
Tampa, FL.
Still hoping for an add on defense. JBB was willing to move young guys Raddysh, Katchouk, and Joseph, but somehow Foote still remains untouchable? I just don't see what the team sees in him at this point, but maybe he will turn the corner in his D+6 year.
 

Zwui21

Registered User
Aug 31, 2019
2,246
2,829

Weekes hasn't Tweeted about this, and I've got the Sportsnet stream up. He's on ESPN. Anyone been watching that?

Yeah same. Maybe this guy fell for a troll account? Can't figure how we'd fit Nash, unless someone gets moved but I highly doubt it'd be for Nash lmao
 

DistantThunderRep

Registered User
Mar 8, 2018
19,917
16,788
Killorn - Stammer - Kuch
Palat - Point - Cirelli
Hagel - Paul - Colton
Maroon - Bellemare - Perry
Nash

Hedman - Ruuta
McDonagh - Bogosian
Sergachev - Cernak
Foote

Vasy
 

Zwui21

Registered User
Aug 31, 2019
2,246
2,829
What does our ideal playoff forward lineup look like right now?
Palat - Point - Kuch
Killorn - Cirelli - Stammer
Hagel - Colton - Paul
Maroon - Bellamare - Perry

But I think we gotta sort the second line. Cirelli and Killorn can't provide the ideal setup to use Stammer at his full potential.
I'd like to see Hagel on a line with stammer, as he's great at retrieving pucks and he likes to set up apparently
 

The Gongshow

Fire JBB
Jul 17, 2014
25,814
8,295
Toronto
So for only a 2nd and a prospect we could have got Rakell..........
I hate the Hagel deal even more now. I'd rather have Rakell for the rental tbh. He takes top 6, slot Cirelli down to the 3C. boom.
 

Point21

Registered User
Oct 23, 2018
9,166
7,202
Strange move, unless we are trying to send him down and its just a conditional pick if he gets claimed

Also:
 

JFleegs

Registered User
Dec 9, 2010
4,733
2,876
Virginia Beach
So for only a 2nd and a prospect we could have got Rakell..........
I hate the Hagel deal even more now. I'd rather have Rakell for the rental tbh. He takes top 6, slot Cirelli down to the 3C. boom.
Rakell is a floater, Hagel is a motor...Also ABB is not a bottom 6 forward he would be useless in the playoffs in that position. Nash is insurance on the bottom six big body can play solid defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnakeIdol

ccman68

Registered User
Dec 9, 2017
4,240
4,524
rakell is like a bigger tyler johnson we don't need a player like that
 

DistantThunderRep

Registered User
Mar 8, 2018
19,917
16,788
So for only a 2nd and a prospect we could have got Rakell..........
I hate the Hagel deal even more now. I'd rather have Rakell for the rental tbh. He takes top 6, slot Cirelli down to the 3C. boom.
2nd + roster player + prospect. They haven't said anything about quality there yet. And Pittsburgh's prospects suck.
 

SnakeIdol

Registered User
Mar 3, 2018
146
142
Why even trade for Nash. He's not really considered a depth piece at all... incase of injury I'd rather ABB
When Nash is on the ice neither team scores. That's a very useful piece for Cooper come playoff hockey. Nash has gave Tampa fits for years getting into the zone. I'm very glad Toronto or Boston didn't trade for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JFleegs

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad