Why do you think Josh Ho-Sang will be the BPA at the time? No doubt Lou takes BPA though ( I just hope it isn't a goalie).
Button has him at 39, THN 27, ISS, 18, hockeyprospect.com 61, McKeen's 33, and NHL CS 22 NAS.
Kempe is 28 on McKenzie, but Craig Button has him as a 10.
Barbashev is 23 on Mckenzie's list, but Craig Button has him at 14.
I don't watch these players play, but I like Craig buttons opinion in the past.
http://www.tsn.ca/draftcentre/feature/?id=38615 (Larsson draft)
Kempe would be such an awesome get, but I feel like I'm getting my hopes up for a guy who'll be picked in the top 25.
Kempe is a strong, bullish forward that has size, strength and a work ethic to match. He can be tenacious on the forecheck and never misses finishing a check. He has a heavy shot and isn't shy to drive towards the net. (August 2013)
A good skater with good size really makes it hard to believe that he'll last until 30.
Sounds like Ruutu
My only issue with Bleackley is that, at least at #30, I'd rather see someone taken who has a little less questions about offense. He's unquestionably a "Devils" kind of player, but right now the team needs scoring more than that.
What I like most about the Devils is how, if you're gonna succeed, you have to BECOME a "Devils" player. Pretty much everyone that comes through the system learns to play the right way (if they stick with the team, at least), so I'd rather have prospects with more raw skill and then work on rounding them out. Skill is what our system is missing most.
It’s the only job where you can be right 15 percent of the time and be ruled a Hall of Famer for success. You are going to be wrong 85 or 80 percent of the time, and if you hit on 2.5 home runs every Draft, you are par with some of the best scouts ever. -- Mike Futa, director of amateur scouting for the LA Kings
Found this quote amusing for certain posters still complaining about old drafts.
Good find, and it further validates that Conte heads a bottom feeding scouting staff.
Good find, and it further validates that Conte heads a bottom feeding scouting staff.
http://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/draft/teams/dr00007066.html
2001: 11 picks/11 strikeouts
2002: 11 picks/11 strikeouts (unless you want to count Cam as a single?)
2003: 7 picks/6 strikeouts, 1 home run (Parise)
2004: 7 picks/ 6 strikeouts, 1 good pick (Zajac)
2005: 7 picks/4 whiffs, 1 good find (Fayne), 2 more NHL players (Bergfors, Fraser) Don't care that we flipped Bergfors for Kovy, it was not a great pick, Oshie picked next.
2006: 8 picks/7 strikeouts, 1 untimely passing (Vasyunov).
2007: 6 picks/5 whiffs, top one caught looking bust (Hoeffel), one decent find in Halischuk
2008: 9 picks/1 big bust (Teddy), 1 home run (Henrique), the rest whiffs (with small chance Burlon becomes useful).
It's too early and unfair to judge his drafts from 2009-on at this point.
.....I was thinking it brought more leeway. You're still cherry picking a lot of names which doesn't prove anything and seem overly upset about somebody like Hoeffel who was a late 2nd rounder in a shallow draft.
I'm not cherry picking, but providing data to back up my claims.
I don't expect a home run at 57, but, I remember a lot of us at the time saying that Hoeffel was a poor choice.
I also recall Jonathan the Rags fan called Hoeffel a non-NHLer the day of that draft.
The guy has limited to subpar skills, just a fast skater.
It's not hard to notice Wayne Simmonds picked 4 slots later.
I could even dig deeper and uncover more Conte first round gaffes such as:
2006: Corrente
2001: Foster
1999: Ahonen
1997: Damphousse
How about our top pick in 2002 @51, Kadeykin, out of hockey within 2 years of being drafted.
Us fans like to moan during games, we want the Devils to ice a better product and to win.
The crux of the 3 out of 4 years issue is our poor drafting records.
Conte must be held accountable.
Or the fact that they lost two of their best players in two consecutive years. They would have made the playoffs in 10-11 if it wasn't for Maclean.
http://www.torontosun.com/2014/06/24/the-curious-case-of-controversial-nhl-prospect-joshua-ho-sang
interesting read on ho-sang
Part of the equation, but we have no depth to replace them nor when injuries strike at forward.
You would think he would have found some top end talent even by accident in rounds 2-4 more than just 2 or 3 times through all of those drafts.
Yeah, those grand total of zero games Jonathan had seen Hoeffel play at the time really qualified him to reach a judgement on the pick.
This just keeps getting better...
Or the fact that they lost two of their best players in two consecutive years. They would have made the playoffs in 10-11 if it wasn't for Maclean.
Kings:
2007: Hickey at 4th overall
2010: Forbort at 15th overall
2011: Gibson at 49th overall
A team whiffing on picks? impossible.
I'm not cherry picking, but providing data to back up my claims.
I don't expect a home run at 57, but, I remember a lot of us at the time saying that Hoeffel was a poor choice.
I also recall Jonathan the Rags fan called Hoeffel a non-NHLer the day of that draft.
The guy has limited to subpar skills, just a fast skater.
It's not hard to notice Wayne Simmonds picked 4 slots later.
I could even dig deeper and uncover more Conte first round gaffes such as:
2006: Corrente
2001: Foster
1999: Ahonen
1997: Damphousse
Hoeffel, Rodwell, what's the difference.
Guys with little to no upside at the time they were picked.
More important were the early round whiffs.
I'm hoping Conte reinvented himself starting with the 2009 draft.
I am hopeful that many of our picks will be gems in the rough.