What is the draft order
the spitfire11 method: pieces of paper and a hatI believe they use some kind of randomization algorithm to determine draft order.
Billy_Shoe1721 - Malmo RedhawksA lot of rookies, I hope they're all up for the task.
Shucks, thanks. I thought so. Certainly a great concept team playing a very distinctive style. I don't think I ever planned and executed such a thought-out plan in my life. Very fun. I learned a lot about hockey history in the process of researching for that.The last Nighthawks team was the most awesome EVER.
We will start a roster thread once the draft order is done and divisional alignments are known. See the ATD12 roster thread to see how it works:Link to the team roster?
PM sent.I meant a link to the roster of the last Nighthawks team you guys were talking about.
If one of the rookies is looking for a consultant, I'd be willing to help out. Not a co-GM. Just someone who can provide advice, tips, GM scouting reports, a consistent presence on the boards, etc. But it will need to be a situation where it's going to be beneficial, and not argumentative.Billy_Shoe1721 - Malmo Redhawks
markrander87 - Chief De Laval
Velociraptor - California Golden Seals
hungryhungryhippy - Vancouver Maroons
NGARV - Edmonton Armadillos
Nighthawks - New Haven Nighthawks
ATD12: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=698578
ATD11: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=639759
ATD10: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=570189
These past draft threads should give you some idea of how it goes.
If one of the rookies is looking for a consultant, I'd be willing to help out. Not a co-GM. Just someone who can provide advice, tips, GM scouting reports, a consistent presence on the boards, etc. But it will need to be a situation where it's going to be beneficial, and not argumentative.
A lot of rookies, I hope there all up for the task.
I agree with VI having veto power.
Only problem I have with this rule is the reliance on one person. I'm going to use VanI himself as the example; he was commish to start the draft last time, then had to leave for personal reasons. Obviously, that hopefully won't happen again, but really, I don't think just because someone is commish, he'll have to sign on everyday (if he has quite a bit of time between his picks). Which is essentially what would be required, because there could be a trade at any time, and it's ridiculous to expect that specific person to be able to see it at any given time. Let's say an hour after the person with veto power has called it a night and has sent a list to someone, a trade is made. The veto-person goes to work/school/whatever, and gets back 18 hours after the trade is made. Perfectly reasonable on his part, but it's held up the draft. GM's are impatient. Understandably. Yet, there'd be 27 teams relying on that one person to be online. And it wouldn't be fair to rely on that person all the time.
Maybe I'm not making sense, but while I'm good with VanI having veto power, I think that rule should be tinkered a bit, for his convenience.
Technically though, I think we've only had one veto-worthy trade in ATD history, and that was the first time someone had crossed the line that had not yet been set. I highly doubt we see any trades in this draft that cross the line. So it probably doesn't matter, if there is a ridiculous trade, we can wait a day or two (at worst) for things to get sorted out.
a deadline is a deadlineIf we get to the deadline with an odd number of teams, would we wait a bit for one more to join to at least make it even?
thanks. (i feel bad about the fall draft, but it's not everyday you lose your job and are kicked out the country you're living in)Thing is, if there's one person we should be comfortable relying on, it's VI. The guy is always around at ATD time.
certainly, I'll probably shoot you a PM every once in a while