monster_bertuzzi
registered user
Vlad The Impaler said:Definitly.
I don't like liars.
In what way did I lie? I simply said Sportsnet plays CHL games here in the Pacific region.
Vlad The Impaler said:Definitly.
I don't like liars.
Bure9 said:Jessiman, because he's American.
Bure9 said:Now I can't even be patriotic?
Bure9 said:Now I can't even be patriotic?
Strizzi said:The funny thing is that while I've never seen him play, what one hears is that Bernier has really improved in that department.
I know it's stupid of me, but that made me laugh.moosefan said:Steve Bernier has really improved his all around play, conditioning and work ethic.
I would take Bernier over Jussimen. I still think Jussimen is a project that has too much of a boom or bust tag that Bernier out weighs him
If you are going to rant & rave , you should at least have balls to admit the foundation of your original comments about Bernier is shakey. Its pretty widely acknowledged by those who follow the Q that Bernier's game has improved alot in this last hockey year, as has his conditioning. In fact, the knock against him was really not his work ethic on the ice (which you seem to imply), it was his conditioning.Draft Guru said:What a moron. Getting made fun of because my name? Never seen it. If you don't trust my credibility, that's fine with me. Like I care what you think.
I wrote for HF for 3 years and had an article appear in the HF Magazine. I was instrumental in developing the top 50 and organizational rankings, as well as other projects while Mark Fischel was still in charge. The Rangers' section of Hockey's Future was always the best and most frequently updated when I was around. I wrote over 200 articles for this site. What have you done? Nothing. Idiot. You're are not worth the time of day. You are just another one of numerous punks on these boards. I still remember YOU from years back when you got banned and your post totals were taken away and you cried forever, walking around with the title "Add 15,000 to Post Total" like it was cool or something to be the top 10 in posts. Quality over quantity, my friend. Your posts certainly lack quality.
So, just because you know something about Rangers prospects doesn't mean you know anything about prospects in the 2004 draft or propsects leading up to the 2003 draft and prospects leading up to the 2002 draft. Just because you are a writer doesn't mean anything also, I used to be a writer for a couple months on this site. They were asking for writers at the time you signed up and you said you would do it. I guarenteed you only read then copy what you read. You can have an article in that magazine, that was the worst magazine I ever read regarding prospects. The information as a whole was 100 degree's off. Most of the articles weren't proof edited where there were gramar and spelling errors.Draft Guru said:What a moron. Getting made fun of because my name? Never seen it. If you don't trust my credibility, that's fine with me. Like I care what you think.
I wrote for HF for 3 years and had an article appear in the HF Magazine. I was instrumental in developing the top 50 and organizational rankings, as well as other projects while Mark Fischel was still in charge. The Rangers' section of Hockey's Future was always the best and most frequently updated when I was around. I wrote over 200 articles for this site. What have you done? Nothing. Idiot. You're are not worth the time of day. You are just another one of numerous punks on these boards. I still remember YOU from years back when you got banned and your post totals were taken away and you cried forever, walking around with the title "Add 15,000 to Post Total" like it was cool or something to be the top 10 in posts. Quality over quantity, my friend. Your posts certainly lack quality.
Vlad The Impaler said:You can. But it would be much more useful if you knew what the word means.
Bure9 said:You must have a lot of friends. Sorry I didn't look up the word before I used it. If I did, though, you probably would have thought of another way to degrade me. Did I use degrade right?
I'm American, but you don't judge a player on there nationality. I hope you were being sarcastic.Bure9 said:Now I can't even be patriotic?
That's impresive ****! To you:Draft Guru said:What a moron. Getting made fun of because my name? Never seen it. If you don't trust my credibility, that's fine with me. Like I care what you think.
I wrote for HF for 3 years and had an article appear in the HF Magazine. I was instrumental in developing the top 50 and organizational rankings, as well as other projects while Mark Fischel was still in charge. The Rangers' section of Hockey's Future was always the best and most frequently updated when I was around. I wrote over 200 articles for this site. What have you done? Nothing. Idiot. You're are not worth the time of day. You are just another one of numerous punks on these boards. I still remember YOU from years back when you got banned and your post totals were taken away and you cried forever, walking around with the title "Add 15,000 to Post Total" like it was cool or something to be the top 10 in posts. Quality over quantity, my friend. Your posts certainly lack quality.
He lives in NY, doesn't see anyone in the CHL which holds the majority of the prospects, doesn't get Sportsnet or Rogers which shows many CHL games. I would take the opinion of atleast 10 rangers fans over him that post on this board and yes he was made fun of two years ago for his little false scouting reports on a couple players.Broadway Crosby said:That's impresive ****! To you:
What do you mean by "the punks on the board"? Guys who don't know anything, or guys who think they know everything, but have never seen the player play?
BTW, I have admitted that I have never seen either prospect play, and I base my opinions by the articles I read about them.
How do you know he doesn't get tapes of the prospects?JasonMacIsaac said:He lives in NY, doesn't see anyone in the CHL which holds the majority of the prospects, doesn't get Sportsnet or Rogers which shows many CHL games. I would take the opinion of atleast 10 rangers fans over him that post on this board and yes he was made fun of two years ago for his little false scouting reports on a couple players.
Anyone who says they get tapes from friends all over the place you know for a fact are BS'ers. People won't tape games just to send them to their friends. Nobody is that dumb. You never hear guys like Vlad or DrChimera going on about their friends sending tapes, they go on personal viewings or on a friends word. Thats the same I go on, I see around 40 Eagles games a year in person and on TV. From there I see every QMJHL prospect. The WHL and QMJHL I see maybe 6 games up till the memorial cup plus allstar games. I usually go on word or from listening to games on radio like London Knights who I followed all year. In europe its really hard to follow so you rely on WJC and from some of the european posters on this site and others. I would say 98% of the posters on here BS about how many prospects they see. I was lucky enough to have the WJC come to Sydney last year.Broadway Crosby said:How do you know he doesn't get tapes of the prospects?