Confirmed with Link: Skinner traded to Buffalo for 2nd, 3rd, 6th, and prospect

Status
Not open for further replies.

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,419
139,448
Bojangles Parking Lot
I think much like the Leafs losing JvR and Bozak, that this trade could be addition by subtraction. Canes will get better as a unit, albiet with less flash.

Except for the part where the Leafs simultaneously added better players at every position than the Canes have managed to find, I agree that this is likely to magically make the Canes better by making them worse.
 

GoldiFox

Registered User
Apr 21, 2014
13,287
32,030
Montreal’s GM said the offers for Pacioretty were weak. Could just be the market combined with the Canes being actively interested in moving Skinner off the roster.

Waddell could turn around and flip assets for Panarin or Pacioretty. Capitalize on the same poor market while upgrading the player.
 

Drivebytrucker

Registered User
Jan 8, 2011
1,238
4,348
love this trade.

i would have been happy just waiving the puke.

His effort level last season was one of the most ridiculous displays I've ever seen.


you really think we should have got a first for a guy with concussion issues who was -27 playing against 3rd liners last year?

we save 5 million and we get better by subtraction
 

Ole Gil

Registered User
May 9, 2009
5,714
8,951
I think we all recognized the huge glaring holes in Skinner's game, and somehow hoped none of the GM's wouldn't notice.

He doesn't play winning hockey. There's no other way of saying it.

Was still hoping they'd get more for him, but I wouldn't have given more for him. And I think the Canes are better off without him.
 

KingsHockey24

Registered User
Aug 1, 2013
14,218
12,632
Why not just hold onto Skinner and Faulk and shoot for the playoffs?

And if it isn't going to well trade them off at the deadline? Seems useless to trade a 30 goal scorer for no one that will help your roster right now.

Obviously the return won't be as nice letting them go at the deadline but it's not like the package you got today was all that.
 
May 23, 2016
2,991
10,236
Raleigh, NC
Montreal’s GM said the offers for Pacioretty were weak. Could just be the market combined with the Canes being actively interested in moving Skinner off the roster.

Waddell could turn around and flip assets for Panarin or Pacioretty. Capitalize on the same poor market while upgrading the player.

I really hope so. Put whatever futures are needed with Faulk to get a top 6 forward.
 

Drivebytrucker

Registered User
Jan 8, 2011
1,238
4,348
e
Nothing about this makes sense for a team desperate to get back to the playoffs this season. The pieces that were traded for are not worth the reduced chance we now have of making the playoffs this year.


Hes complete dogshit in his own zone, questionable work ethic, doesnt make players around him better, not a leader

think getting rid of him improves our odds
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
51,387
49,276
Winston-Salem NC
Ugh, despise this trade at least from a timing standpoint. If you can't get a better return then a B+ prospect, 2nd, 3rd, and 6th right now then it's better to have him on the team for the regular season. IMHO a playoff run is FAR more important than this kind of return. Have to hope we're packaging Faulk with some other assets for an upgrade at this point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad