Played games imo are the better indicator. If you count only points, it only favors forwards. If you count games, it takes defencemen and goalies more even on the comparison.
From 2014+2015+2016+2017 drafts:
1. Boston, 620 games (7 players)
2. Edmonton, 555 games (5 players)
3. Arizona, 552 games (9 players)
4. Vancouver, 514 games (5 players)
5. Toronto, 500 games (5 players)
6. Winnipeg, 496 games (6 players)
7. Florida, 492 games (5 players)
8. Carolina, 461 games (7 players)
9. Buffalo, 460 games (5 players)
10. Philadelphia, 410 games (5 players)
11. Nashville, 407 games (5 players)
12. Columbus, 406 games (5 players)
13. Anaheim, 398 games (5 players)
14. Calgary, 388 games (5 players)
15. Colorado, 305 games (5 players)
16. St. Louis, 303 games (5 players)
17. New Jersey, 287 games (5 players)
18. San Jose, 278 games (3 players)
19. NY Islanders, 267 games (5 players)
20. Detroit, 243 games (3 players)
21. Tampa Bay, 217 games (3 players)
22. Chicago, 201 games (2 players)
23. Minnesota, 172 games (3 players)
24. Montreal, 167 games (5 players)
25. Los Angeles, 129 games (3 players)
26. Pittsburgh, 108 games (3 players)
27. Washington, 94 games (2 players)
28. Ottawa, 92 games (7 players)
29. Dallas, 53 games (3 players)
30. NY Rangers, 3 games (2 players)
Vegas, 0 games (0 players) only 1 draft.
But this is still a stupid comparison, because almost all NCAA players from 2014-2017 drafts are still at NCAA. Or some potential Europeans are at Europe. If you got late-boomer hits from there, it doesn't show at all. That's why I wouldn't be judging Tyler Wright yet. We need more time to see his abilities. bigger drafts with more picks and higher top picks coming. He hasn't had an edge on the draft position until 2018.
Next season brings more youth in and we can add those in the comparison.
Also, if I have time, I try to do a comparison, where is an expected rating for the picks the teams had in use. Then the results vs. expected results. There was those draft table articles, and I try to build some "poor-man's" formula based on those.