I lean slightly the other way when it comes to Thornton/Marleau/Boyle mainly cause they've all already got gold medals and are older and could probably use the weeks of recoup in the middle of the season. I won't be upset if they do go of course and it would be a great for them again i'm sure, but I would almost rather they not.
Might be a dumb question but... what position would Burns most likely play if selected?
you know what Forward , i would see him on that team..Might be a dumb question but... what position would Burns most likely play if selected?
Couture getting snubbed would probably provide a nice bump to his game.
There was a rumor that he asked not to be invited. I wouldn't call it an all out snub.I think this is solved by none of them having a good shot. I thought Marleau would own on international ice even at 34, but Team Canada wants nothing to do with him.
There was a rumor that he asked not to be invited. I wouldn't call it an all out snub.
Do you happen to have a link or something for that rumor? Just seems surprising given how proud he seemed to be playing in Vancouver. Maybe he decided he needs the rest/time with family during the break.
Maybe he doesn't want to go to Russia in protest of their hatred of gays?
Doubt that. Thorntons been in the ads for You can Play, and was invited to the camp... Just didn't go because of some family thing IIRC.
And not all Russian people hate gay people just because their government made some stupid laws.
Some really complimentary quotes from Mike Babcock re: Couture and Marleau after the Wings game.
I don't think Patty/Cooch/Pickles are as much of long shots for team canada as the majority of uninformed fans on this site who never watch the sharks would lead the masses to believe...
Some really complimentary quotes from Mike Babcock re: Couture and Marleau after the Wings game.
I don't think Patty/Cooch/Pickles are as much of long shots for team canada as the majority of uninformed fans on this site who never watch the sharks would lead the masses to believe...
Links?
I live in Michigan so I believe it was an interview with whoever their postgame reporter is here.
The reporter asked him if the ice was crowded and if that's what he expected coming into this game or something. He said that both teams checked well and then brought up that Couture and Marleau and Kennedy did a real good job going head to head against Dasyuk and Zetterberg. Also mentioned that he thought his 3rd line (2nd? The Weiss line) played well against our 3rd line and the rest was pretty even.
Or something...
It seemed to me that he was inferring that the Couture line outplayed their top line (or at least neutralized it), their 3rd outplayed ours, and the rest was a draw. I dunno... it was two days ago lol but that was the impression I took away from it at the time.
Oh okay, gotcha. I'll take your word for it.
Links?
http://video.redwings.nhl.com/videocenter/
October 21
MFCU Post Game Babcock
That might be what hes talking about.
"People talk about hockey sense, and that's what Joe is about," said USA Hockey executive Jim Johannson. "He's always in the right place at the right time."
"If you play Pavelski at center, he makes the guys around him better," Johannson said. "If you play him on the wing, he makes the line better."
Although it's early, the Americans would appear to be better with Pavelski as top center. "He always seems to get points at critical times in the game," Johannson said
"Their team's changed," Babcock said Monday morning. "Couture, in my opinion, has basically taken over as their No. 1 centre."