Simply amazing that you are sitting on a high horse when all that you keep posting are logical fallacies. Also quite telling how you keep complaining that educated people belittle the uneducated but here you are belittling people yourself, very hypocritical.
Nobody argues that science has an answer for everything, but only the uneducated argue that gaps in knowledge are a valid argument for pseudoscience or belief in the supernatural. You're arguing a fallacy called the God of the gaps, you can google it and teach yourself why it isn't a valid argument, and refrain from using it in the future.
You are putting words in her mouth, you barely have any idea what she is trying to learn, since the original poster included very little detail into what pseudoscience she is "learning".
It looks to me like you are trying to defend your beliefs in pseudoscience, not hers.
The only person who keeps using the word belittle, or implying that attempting to educate her with real science is belittling, is you. This is a common occurrence with the anti-vaxxers and pseudoscience believers, criticizing information because it is coming from an invalid source is not "belittling" or an attack on your "opinion". The fact is pseudoscience is based on non-facts. The person has posted that they are trying to make their mother realize it is non-factual, the user did not post anything about belittling, but posted that they are criticizing the material.
Your Trump "argument" is simply a red herring.
