Hey I am not the coach, just guessing on what he'll do based on his previous decisions.
Chabot-Ceci
Boro-Cleasson
Wolanin-Harpur
Is this better?
(lol) I know it wasn't clear with the question mark but I wasn't blaming you for your combos nor do I believe the coach is to blame. Boucher can only try the pieces he's been given.
To Expand:
This and a few previous comments I've made about the D situation have been was more about longer term org planning and how difficult it is for a young D to play in the NHL and then add to that having to play with a major disadvantage. With the players they currently have, eventually the best option might be if Chabot, Harpur and Wolanin (when and if the latter is ready and good enough) could play their natural left side and Karlsson, Ceci and possibly Jaros could play the right. Boro, Claesson or Wideman (the latter a possible short term re-sign) could be the rotation pieces depending on progress, the opponent or injuries. Again this is based mostly on current NHL or near NHL ready inventory but a trade might be inevitable and some of these guys may also be showing they don't belong and get passed by others (ie Lajoie or Englund)
When some of us as fans wondered why they didn't play Phaneuf on the right when he was here given that he had played that side with Tor we thought it had to do with Boucher's left side trap but possibly it was part of longer term management thinking knowing the players they had in the org that were near NHL ready. Maybe they hoped and still hope that one or two of these guys can make the jump across without it affecting their game too much. It's ok to experiment now but they can't afford to go on hope to start the next season if its apparent it doesn't work.