Confirmed with Link: Sabres re-sign D Jacob Bryson to 2 yr deal @ $1.85M AAV - Waived 12/18/23, Re-assigned 1/20/24

DJN21

Registered User
Aug 8, 2011
9,480
2,623
Rochester
I wish someone would just claim him and end this misery. Stillman, Clauge and Novikov or whatever cant be worse of an on ice product. This experiment needs to end.
 

Mattilaus

Registered User
Sep 12, 2014
7,269
5,612
Beyond the Wall
What happens if he is not claimed?
Does all of his salary get removed from our cap?
I believe it is a 1 way deal. If you could get out of bad cap hits by just burying them in the minors, every team would be doing it. I could be completely and absolutely wrong on his contract however.

EDIT: dotcommunism has corrected me below. Can always count on him when it comes to contracts.
 
Last edited:

dotcommunism

Moderator
Aug 16, 2007
5,182
3,348
What happens if he is not claimed?
Does all of his salary get removed from our cap?
They'll only clear $1.15M of cap if he's sent down to Rochester (and, of course, this is all pro-rated and based on how long he's actually assigned to Rochester and so on)
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
150,864
100,735
Tarnation
Cap savings doesn't really matter for Buffalo since they are still in excess of $6.1 million in available cap space. Getting an extra $1.1M off the books doesn't really mean anything with that sort of chunk of useable space out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KrakenSabresMike

Sabresfansince1980

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
10,886
5,286
from Wheatfield, NY
Its how it would have played out
How so? Replacing Bryson with a D-man prospect wasn't possible. KA has pretty much in no way tried to waste games for FW prospects by having them sit in the press box on the big club. They either stay in Rochester or play (up to four minutes by Granato's standards).

The LOGICAL move would have been to waive Bryson in October and trade for a guy like Sturm. Slot down both Jost and Krebs in starts and/or ice time, and never have to play the revolving door of Biro, Rousek, Rosen, Kulich, Savoie, and Murray for 21 games. Of course that means doing what a GM should have done, not what KA preferred.
 

Gras

Registered User
Mar 21, 2014
6,166
3,413
Phoenix
How so? Replacing Bryson with a D-man prospect wasn't possible. KA has pretty much in no way tried to waste games for FW prospects by having them sit in the press box on the big club. They either stay in Rochester or play (up to four minutes by Granato's standards).

The LOGICAL move would have been to waive Bryson in October and trade for a guy like Sturm. Slot down both Jost and Krebs in starts and/or ice time, and never have to play the revolving door of Biro, Rousek, Rosen, Kulich, Savoie, and Murray for 21 games. Of course that means doing what a GM should have done, not what KA preferred.
Thats if Strum was available and it a price that KA would pay, the fact he wasnt in on Tatar means he probably wouldnt be in on Strum, you most likely have someone like Rousek or Rosen rotating in and out of the press box.
 

Sabresfansince1980

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 29, 2011
10,886
5,286
from Wheatfield, NY
Thats if Strum was available and it a price that KA would pay, the fact he wasnt in on Tatar means he probably wouldnt be in on Strum, you most likely have someone like Rousek or Rosen rotating in and out of the press box.
Well we're talking a different language. The whole premise of waiving Bryson 10 weeks ago is based on a GM making the proper decisions. You're talking about an if this/then what scenario entirely based on what KA would do...which is probably another mistake based on the ultra-conservative and patient "plan" the organization has committed to.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad