Hoping for Alex Semin 2.0.
He also has nowhere near the puck skills Semin has. He's a very direct player with great speed and size. It is much closer to a young Bill Guerin in regards to how he plays offensively, although Tippett isn't as physical.I don't recall Semin ever having the desire to go as hard to the net as Tippett does.
His raw tools have always been amazing, very few have that size, speed and shot combo. There was a reason many thought he was the best player in the 2015 OHL draft. The question has always been his IQ, but he seems to be getting into good spots for scoring chances and is converting.On a nutty goal per game pace now.
Should be getting way more attention and is a better prospect than Tolvanen IMO. Had 2G+1A tonight to give him 23G+14A in 29 games on the year. Reminds me of Corey Perry with a little bit of Kessel
Perry and Kessel are pretty much opposite players. The only thing they've got in common is that they have great shots.
How's Tippett's skating? Hopefully closer to Kessel's than Perry's.
Perry and Kessel are pretty much opposite players. The only thing they've got in common is that they have great shots.
How's Tippett's skating? Hopefully closer to Kessel's than Perry's.
What kind of style does this kid play? Who would you compare him too? What type of NHL numbers do you think he will post? Where should he be drafted?
Guerin is a good comparison to start with.
Skille is a big guy with good o up side and plays in corners well. Guerin, Tkachuk with lil more speed. A talented power forward.
My comparison has been Ryan Smyth. It fits better than Guerin IMO. He has great leadership qualities and good speed just like him.
I think he's more like Bill Guerin personally. He's probably a bit more well-rounded than Guerin, but possesses good size, a powerful skating stride, and a wicked shot off the wing. I'd project him to be a 30-35 goal guy at the NHL level.Will he be able to get Ryan Smyth, or Guerin like numbers(how many points, and how many goals do you say?)? Is he a future captain? First line potential?
Im praying he falls to #10 for us...
Put it this way...if Skille is still on the board at 10(I don't think he will be...I think the Sens will grab him), the Canucks need to grab him and run.
And yes, Guerin is a very good comparison.
I thought Skille was a LW......
But whatever. I'll be happy with whatever Nonis ends up selecting, as long as the phrase "The kid reminds me of a young Trevor Linden" doesn't pop up.
If the Canucks really wanted Skille, I'm sure they can find a way to trade up a couple slots to guarantee that they have him.
http://hfboards.mandatory.com/showthread.php?t=252723hehe yea, I rather hear the phrase "The kid reminds me of a young Pavel Bure" instead.
He's big and natural. He has huge upside. He's gonna be the kind of player you will need when you're gonna go to the war. He has a good heavy shot and accurate. He likes to deliver and throwing big hits. It's just a matter of time when you gonna see it put it all together.
I love his game. IMO he's going to be a star.
Count me among his fans. I also think he will have a very good NHL career and will be a quality leader on the ice.
He doesn't posses the Guerin's speed, but he has a similar package in terms of scoring blistering shot. He reminds me Scott Hartnell 6 years ago.
Canucks fans saw Skille score two terrific goals yesterday that really demonstrate his individual skill.great comparison there. I didn't really get the Guerin comparisons to be honest.. Skille is a more offensively talented Hartnell.
If the tools don't translate, there might not be much else there.McKenzie's pre-season ranking: The 'Nolan Patrick Draft'
By Bob McKenzie
Sep 22
...
8. Owen Tippett: The Mississauga Steelhead winger has NHL speed, an NHL shot and the physical tools to play a strong drive-the-net game.
He is, however, considered by scouts to be a little one dimensional. That is, when he's putting the puck in the net on a regular basis, he's obviously highly effective, as any player would be. But when he's not scoring goals, he's not as likely to be contributing in other ways.
He had only one goal at the Hlinka tourney this summer and some of the scouts came away hoping for more from Tippett.
...
I think a MacKinnon comparison would be close as well. Probably not as explosive off the top as MacKinnon but he has that same type of shot and he's not afraid to finish checks on the forecheck like MacKinnon. MacKinnon is a better playmaker, but I think the shooting, skating, hands, and physicality are similar.That's why I said they're a mix aka hybrid. He plays like Perry but not quite as physical but is a better skater like Kessel but no where near as soft. Meet in the middle and you get Tippett, not that hard of an idea.
Phil Kessel and Corey Perry see the game at a different level than Tippett does. Kessel has way better vision off the rush and finding the open man, Perry is a way better player off the cycle. He's closer to someone like Evander Kane or Virtanen style wise but with a less developed physical game.That's why I said they're a mix aka hybrid. He plays like Perry but not quite as physical but is a better skater like Kessel but no where near as soft. Meet in the middle and you get Tippett, not that hard of an idea.
I don't think he is a better prospect or on another tier than Tolvanen. I'd actually say its more likely Tolvanen is a tier above him. Tolvanen has better positioning and in general is a much smarter player. I'd also say his shot is probably better. He is a very quick strike type of player. Tippett has the better tools (size and skating), but his hockey-iq scares me. Too often I find his entire line devoid of playmaking and making proper reads (this can extend to the PP), he is a great player off the rush with a great shot, but so were Yakupov, Evander Kane and Virtanen. I'd say for that reason alone, Tolvanen is probably safer.Should be getting way more attention and is a better prospect than Tolvanen IMO. Had 2G+1A tonight to give him 23G+14A in 29 games on the year. Reminds me of Corey Perry with a little bit of Kessel
Phil Kessel and Corey Perry see the game at a different level than Tippett does. Kessel has way better vision off the rush and finding the open man, Perry is a way better player off the cycle. He's closer to someone like Evander Kane or Virtanen style wise but with a less developed physical game.
I don't think he is a better prospect or on another tier than Tolvanen. I'd actually say its more likely Tolvanen is a tier above him. Tolvanen has better positioning and in general is a much smarter player. I'd also say his shot is probably better. He is a very quick strike type of player. Tippett has the better tools (size and skating), but his hockey-iq scares me. Too often I find his entire line devoid of playmaking and making proper reads (this can extend to the PP), he is a great player off the rush with a great shot, but so were Yakupov, Evander Kane and Virtanen. I'd say for that reason alone, Tolvanen is probably safer.
He's a way better skater than Kane or Virtanen. People have different opinions but to me Tolvanen isn't as good as Tippett. Tolvanen is the one who is one-dimensional while Tippett is rounding out his game nicely.
People still as basing their opinions of players from the start of the year