doubledown99
Registered User
- May 21, 2009
- 3,368
- 9
Arizona could also be a team we target for trade. Hanzal & Stone (RHD) would be fits on our current team
Arizona could also be a team we target for trade. Hanzal & Stone (RHD) would be fits on our current team
Wonder what kind of player Edmonton could get back if they packed Eberle + 1st 2017.
Kreider + 2nd?
Kreider would probably be perfect with McD, since he brings both speed, size, grit along with a great shot.
And he's not a floater defensively either.
What other parts? If you're talking about the Hansen, Sutter, Tanev deal then those are more than just "parts". Hansen scored as many 5 vs 5 goals last year as Hall. I don't think I'd deal RNH right now, but if the Canucks continue to free fall they are a very good trading partner for the Oilers.
I don't think Vancouver is a good fit at all unless we're talking about a smaller trade where they make Stetcher available (not gonna happen). The Oilers don't need Tanev, especially not for what he will cost.
Arizona is a good trading partner, Winnipeg and Minnesota as well. Unfortunately, it would likely cost us RNH to get the desired top 4 Dman from those teams or in Winnipeg's case, Nurse since they have a big need on the left side.
I recommended these two players last week. I feel they would be perfect fits for our club. Hanzal would give us such great depth for the playoffs, but the question is if Stone can play a PP successfully for us.
You need to look at who's available really. Maybe make two separate trades. One for Hanzal and then one for Shattenkirk.
*pending our record at the TDL. If we are still first or second in the division, I believe Chia goes all in.
I recommended these two players last week. I feel they would be perfect fits for our club. Hanzal would give us such great depth for the playoffs, but the question is if Stone can play a PP successfully for us.
You need to look at who's available really. Maybe make two separate trades. One for Hanzal and then one for Shattenkirk.
*pending our record at the TDL. If we are still first or second in the division, I believe Chia goes all in.
I don't know if the Blues will move Shattenkirk and if they do I've read they want a 1st rd pick + prospect in return at minimum.
With Stone and Hanzal there value (based on prior UFA's traded) is maybe 2nd rd pick each? Stone isn't a PP QB but would provide us more depth on D and would slot in that #4 slot most likely. So that has value. I'd probably move a 1st rd pick (top 10 protected) for both those guys. This current draft class is suppose to be weak so that 1st isn't probably as valuable as in most years.
That's assuming Arizona values a 1st the same as potentially two 2nd's (assuming that is the value of Stone and Hanzal). So:
Hanzal + Stone (maybe also UFA Vrbata)
for
EDM 2017 1st rd pick
Solidifies our depth and provides us some players that can improve our 5v5 and PK. And I would try to make that move now rather than TDD
Arizona could also be a team we target for trade. Hanzal & Stone (RHD) would be fits on our current team
Ladd got a 1st and one of the Hawks better prospects in Dano as a rental last year. I'd expect the price of Hanzal and Stone to be at least a 1st, Reinhart, and another good prospect.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC · 32s33 seconds ago
Jacob Trouba is re-signing in Winnipeg. Hearing two years, $3M AAV.
I'm shocked that none of the major RFAs went anywhere this year. Shocked I tell you.
Elliotte Friedman @FriedgeHNIC · 32s33 seconds ago
Jacob Trouba is re-signing in Winnipeg. Hearing two years, $3M AAV.
I'm shocked that none of the major RFAs went anywhere this year. Shocked I tell you.
That's a sign and trade type of deal. He won't be in Winnipeg at the end of the season IMO.
@jet walters.... Edler would be an interesting option if the Oilers don't re-sign Russell but I don't see the Canucks dealing him within the division.
I'd really like to pry Montour from Anaheim but Benning might be able to fill that role anyway.
Trouba to the Flames.
Ladd was more highly thought of at that time then Hanzal is now. Ladd was a 1st liner that was a consistent 20 goal scorer and Cup winner. I highly doubt Hanzal is viewed currently the same way Ladd was then. Hanzal is a 3rd line defensive C. Maybe at his absolute peak a 2nd line C. Those players always go for less than 1st liners.
Plus go look at all the other deadline deals. We got Maroon for a 4th rd pick. Boedker was basically traded for a 2nd rd pick (Bleackly). Matthias for a 4th. Purcell for a 3rd etc.
Even going back to past TDD....the common currency is 2nd rd picks.
I'd be surprised if Hanzel was viewed as worth a 1st rd pick. He's injury prone and never has got more than 41 points in a season.
Edit: lol I just read Hanzal is again on IR. Man I like this guy but wow is he injury prone. Still would trade for him. But I wouldn't break the bank. (Stone is on IR also - Concussion).
I thought the best defense in the league was set.
Hanzal and Burns.
Then we go on a hell of a ride through May and June.
If our injuries keep piling up I'd offer a pick for Versteeg
No, f*** that traitor. He chose the Flames so I hope he rots with them
There's a ton of better options out there.