- Apr 27, 2005
- 33,955
- 30,509
I'm curious what Bratt's demotion means for the PP units.
He works the RW half wall as good as anyone we've had in years, hope they keep him there.
I'm curious what Bratt's demotion means for the PP units.
I don't that he's been bump off the top line, but he's essentially stood out on every line he has played on this season, so we'll see. I want to keep Gibbons-Zajac-Coleman together as well because that line has been fantastic.Vatanen has been as advertised . . very effective.
Anyone else bummed about Bratt being pushed down the lineup?
Would've liked to see Palmieri join Zajac and keep the top line the way it was.
Hall - Hischier - Bratt
Johansson - Zajac - Palmieri
Coleman - Boyle - Gibbons
That's a pretty strong top 9.
Ah well I still don't like the combos. Bratt is with basically two fourth liners. Granted Boyle and Noesen have both played really well but they are still fourth liners, not skill guys. Doesn't make sense to me.
Vatanen has been as advertised . . very effective.
Anyone else bummed about Bratt being pushed down the lineup?
Would've liked to see Palmieri join Zajac and keep the top line the way it was.
Hall - Hischier - Bratt
Johansson - Zajac - Palmieri
Coleman - Boyle - Gibbons
That's a pretty strong top 9.
Hynes said he was in hours ago
Hey look at us, agreeing on something like adults.Exactly the way I would set it up. At least this improves our depth tremendously.
Yeah I’m not the biggest fan of breaking up Nico and Bratt
I'm not too worried. Hynes isn't stupid. If the shuffled lines aren't working, I would expect he would try them the other way again. Go back to what works.