Hiesenberg
Registered User
- Jul 2, 2013
- 15,576
- 1,875
#2 to take Amac of our hands, get Grubauer and more. Tempting
What in the hell is going on?
#2 to take Amac of our hands, get Grubauer and more. Tempting
What in the hell is going on?
What could they offer that would be attractive enough? 6th and next years 1st plus a goalie?
What could they offer that would be attractive enough? 6th and next years 1st plus a goalie?
They could offer multiple firsts plus players. #6 + #15 plus a defenseman plus a goalie and they could take MacDonald. Hischier and Patrick are clearly the two best players in the draft but they are not Eichel/ Laine level talents. Vegas could easily make a package that could sway Hextall. I trust the Hextall and the Flyers scouts that they will make the right decision.
But these kinds of proposals ignore the context of our particular situation. We don't need a boatload of prospects - in fact, it could cause us issues down the road with too many prospects being ready at the exact same time. While it's largely true that you can't have "too many" prospects in the big picture, in our situation we need one guy, one 1C, to round off this part of our build. It's entirely possible that Glass or Vilardi will end up being just as good as Patrick, but I can't see it. If they realistically had that chance, with the information we have right now, more scouts and league people would have said something to that effect, and they haven't. They have been consistent and effusive in saying that these two guys are at the top in a tier of their own, and while that tier may not have the separation from its nearest levels, the way McDavid's and Matthews' did, it is still a tier above and we should take advantage of that and not overthink this. This isn't the piece to be playing with.
But every one here is under the assumption that Hextall and the Flyers scouts see these guys the same way as the consensus rankings. The Flyers have a history of going off the board and being proven right later. One of their most disappointing picks was JVR the consensus #2. Maybe they see some of the same things in Patrick that they did in JVR. I don't know. Nobody knows except the Flyers. If they think Glass, Villardi or Pettersson have a similar long term projection as Hischier and Patrick they would be fools not to take a big return for trading down just to follow the consensus. Again I have faith in the Flyers scouts.
Also it's ridiculous to even say a team can get in trouble for having too many good prospects. Prospects are the top trade currency in the league.
and ayy lmao at anybody who thinks we're getting a Godfather offer from Vegas.
Best I could see is #6 + Mystery Box Goalie for #2 + MacDonald.
**** that and **** Hextall with branding iron if he entertains that.
Not to be a downer, but I'm slightly worried when watching his skating.
Don't want to say slow... just seems.... non-fast... un-fast... de-fast.
I don't know anything about skating, but I think when his groin exploded it cost him the ability to drive with his core ... or words to that effect. So I think there is a chance that, while he isn't a great skater, he will look better once his groin knits itself back together. I hope so, anyway. The good thing is that he seems to be very smart out there, so he can make up for some of it with good positioning and anticipation.
based on the opinion that I don't believe Vegas would trade additional 1st round picks to move up 5 spots in a weak draft.Based on what? No need to involve AMac. IF Vegas really wants Patrick, Hexy will make them pay the price he asks. If not, pick Patrick. Pretty simple. McPhee has had all the leverage for the last month, this is the one deal for which he doesn't have leverage.