Well Laine already as an 18yo rookie had a better g/60 than Ovie and 20yo Ovie had almost twice the PP time. The only better rookie seasons goal-scoring-wise have been a 22yo Selänne and 20yo Mike Bossy (tad easier to score goals back then).
Not that embarrassing IMO. But yeah Laine is not looking great so far, but if history is anything to go by, I'm not throwing in the towel just yet. Completely different players anyway.
Laine of course is nowhere near the physical specimen that Ovie was at the same age, but if we forget looks and concentrate on results, it's damn impressive what Laine is doing. And you know with what an excellent line he's been playing with 5v5 to boot.
But this is OT.
Oh give me a break bud.
First of all OVECHKIN didn’t get to play at a younger age cause of the lockout so lets use that against him and brag about Laine, I swear Laine will still be a “teenager” in 8 years To some people.
Secondly, and most importantly have you ever considered that Laine scoring all those goals p/60 at 18 was better then Ovi at 20 BECAUSE of the teams the two have been on and he help surrounding them? Believe it or not the reason people value assists so much (I know no one does with Laine) are because creating the play that scored the goal is just as important as finishing it off? Who is going to score more with a lethal sho? A guy who’s best teammates are Chris Clark and Jeff Halpern or a guy being prime fed by ehlers and little and Perrault and byfugilen and scheifele, Wheeler, Connor, et. Laine is spoonfed a lot of his goals, both Guys have “their spot” like a tarasenko, kucherov and at a time Stamkos did. But as I said better linemates, teammates, easier for a sniper to bury. ALSO Ovechkin as you said was way more physical and that part of the game he added especially in his rookie year in which you’re comparing took him out of offensive zone plays. He’s be wrecking people left and right while Laine just kind of is....there. You see glimpses with Laine he will stickbandle with ease by someone in the neutral zone or he will create a play that takes a ton of skill and younsay to yourself “wow why does this guy not play like this all the time?...I’m not gonna call him a floater but he just doesent add much if he’s not scoring with that shot of his despite those glimpses.
Ovechkin? One of the most entertaining rookie years you cold ever watch. I really hope you watched it and weren’t young at the time and if you were I can understand why it LOOKS why there’s an agrument for Laine. Ovechkin was just destroying people left and right on top of not only scoring with no help but scoring highlight reel goals and highlight reel chances every night.
There are times you watch the jets, and you actually forget he’s on the team.
Prime Thomas Vanek is a better comparable then 20 yr old Ovechkin.
Selannes rookie year? That’s a better one, Laine can come out and score 7 goals in the next three games and it changes nothing. He’s too inconsistent, he doesent bring enough to the game, he’s one dimensional, not a great skater and the fact he gets by big time because the one thing he does great happens to be one thing that matters a great deal.
It’s an insult when I hear who he’s compared too and how much money he should make. I don’t care if he was 18/29 and scored over 40 goals. If I’m a jets fan I back up scheifele, wheeler, and Hellebuyck before him.
Ovechkin also scored over 100 pts and beat out crosby and had over 50 assists too.