Identify those owners. Then demonstrate how they hold those views.Wont work
red bull is playing with the emotions of quebec fans
Fact of the matter there is a group of nhl owners who would not mind to see the only Vancouver, TO and MOntreal have teams
Ott, Cal and Edmonton do not draw duing the regular season and when it comes playoff times--the TV rating go through the floor.
KC and Houston are the next 2 cities to get nhl teams.
I'd rather someone piss in my mouth and poop in my eyes than drink Full ThrottleRed Bull, thats a waste of money, Full Throttle is the stuff man. Way more Caffeine for the same price. Quebec Full Throttles has a better ring to it. Also a pretty good name for a Porn.
PS.I'd rather someone piss in my mouth and poop in my eyes than drink Full Throttle
Quebec Rockstars would be tight, though
I'd rather someone piss in my mouth and poop in my eyes than drink Full Throttle
Quebec Rockstars would be tight, though
The hillarity of the Son of Mike Savage sponsoring a team in Francophone Canada...
PS.
Why the hell is it always assumed that franchises would have to be relocated to put a franchise in QC, Winny, or KC?
Red Balls would pay the expansion fee so **** Pittsburgh haters
Because the league fell into an economical mess in part because of expansion. I doubt they are going to expand quickly soon after the last expansion. The league has already stated that expansion is out of the question.
has the city built an arena that seats over 20K and have the lowered their tax rate--one of the things that killed the team the first time around
And the Quebec provincial debt is out of controll and I can't see that happening.
I see a few posts about the chances of quebec city getting a team again
what is there current arena situation?
I know the peg just built a new arena that seats only 15'500--so that takes them out of the running for a relocation team
Quebec city poulation is 800k(census 2001)
has the city built an arena that seats over 20K and have the lowered their tax rate--one of the things that killed the team the first time around
winnipeg's 15,015 seat arena take us out of the running ?
then we'll just throw a roof over winnipeg stadium and seat at least 40,000 for games since capacity is all that matters, right ?
btw, quebec's attendance didn't kill the team, nor the provincial tax rate. a certain owner (hello mr. aubut) who payed C$8-14 million for the team (depending on the source) was offered U$68 million to sell.
winnipeg's 15,015 seat arena take us out of the running ?
then we'll just throw a roof over winnipeg stadium and seat at least 40,000 for games since capacity is all that matters, right ?
btw, quebec's attendance didn't kill the team, nor the provincial tax rate. a certain owner (hello mr. aubut) who payed C$8-14 million for the team (depending on the source) was offered U$68 million to sell.
Really? Then why did Moody's just upgrade them to Double A??
Quebec has come a long way since the early 2000s with their fiscal issues. I'm not advocating that it would be financially wise for a provincial government to pitch in to help build an arena, but it is certainly within the realm of their budget should Charest so choose. Also, being seen as the man who facilitated bringing the Nordiques back (again, as wise as it would be financially) could be the think that puts him over the top in the next election...Moody's doesn't have a "double A" rating - they have (from bottom to top) A3, A2, A1, Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, and Aaa. Perhaps you're thinking of S&P ?
Besides, "debt rating" means squat when we're talking about the ability of Quebec to kick in money for a new arena. Debt service is the 3rd biggest item in the budget, the government has no money to put into a new arena and it's doubtful the citizens of Quebec are going to go along with putting $200M or so into a new arena for hockey.
Moody's doesn't have a "double A" rating - they have (from bottom to top) A3, A2, A1, Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, and Aaa. Perhaps you're thinking of S&P ?
Besides, "debt rating" means squat when we're talking about the ability of Quebec to kick in money for a new arena. Debt service is the 3rd biggest item in the budget, the government has no money to put into a new arena and it's doubtful the citizens of Quebec are going to go along with putting $200M or so into a new arena for hockey.
Moody's doesn't have a "double A" rating - they have (from bottom to top) A3, A2, A1, Aa3, Aa2, Aa1, and Aaa. Perhaps you're thinking of S&P ?
That said I believe the only way for Winnipeg, Quebec, or any other Canadian city to get another team would be through expansion. I don't think the league would approve of new ownership that has plans to move a team from a US market to a Canadian market. So it looks like QC and Winnipeg won’t be getting new teams for the foreseeable future.
Have a heart, lots can happen in a couple of years... What happens if the US economy tanks 'cause of high oil prices, there are a couple of teams on the brink, and some crazy rich guy like Melnyk puts in a bid for one of the teams to move them to Quebec... or Winnipeg.... or Ft. McMurray!!