Andy99
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 50,791
- 32,860
I went with Murashov for talent alone but between the leaders in this poll of Poulin and Puustinen, Poulin by far…they both have limitations but Poulin looks more ready for NHL duty atm
If you swapped Poulin and Puustinen’s draft positions, Puusy may be considered our top prospect and Poulin wouldn’t even be an after thought.Why?
He’s clearly our best prospect after the three listed.
Well said.If you swapped Poulin and Puustinen’s draft positions, Puusy may be considered our top prospect and Poulin wouldn’t even be an after thought.
If you swapped Poulin and Puustinen’s draft positions, Puusy may be considered our top prospect and Poulin wouldn’t even be an after thought.
I don’t think many are shitting on him, it’s just becoming more obvious by the year that he is unlikely to hit his offensive ceiling. Doesn’t mean he’s not going to be an NHL player.I don't agree at all.
I actually think Poulin is getting shit on by a lot of her fans because of where he was drafted. He's 22 and has had a bunch of off ice issues.
He has produced very well in the AHL for his age and his junior career was impressive.
He has the size and skill of an NHL player and we saw that when he was up in the NHL.
Puustinen is undersized and a lot of his production has been powerplay based.
I'd argue Big Puusy is getting a lot of love because of stat watching versus Poulin getting love for people that have actually paid attention to his play in the AHL and prior.
I don’t think many are shitting on him, it’s just becoming more obvious by the year that he is unlikely to hit his offensive ceiling. Doesn’t mean he’s not going to be an NHL player.
When you’re ranking prospects, most people value goal scoring and point production over anything else because it is the most expensive attribute when it comes to contract value.
Let’s put it this way: no team knowingly drafts a bottom 6 winger with a 1st round pick.I question what people were expecting of him offensively.
I dunno a lot of people who follow WB/S closely don't have much good to say about Poulin.
I get that Poulin has NHL size and draft pedigree and probably more easily projects to be an NHLer (though probably in a depth role) but I guess I always go with higher end potential. Even if that's often a bust scenario.
Regardless this pool is like three or four guys and a sea of whatever. That's what happens when you win a lot for nearly 20 years, I guess.
Let’s put it this way: no team knowingly drafts a bottom 6 winger with a 1st round pick.
I get why people are saying Puustinen but Poulin is a better bet for the NHL IMHO.
Poulin I think could carve out a Bleuger-esque career. Puustinen, Simon if he's lucky.
I don’t know why you think people are lining up with pitch forks wanting to burn Poulin at the stake. I don’t think anyone has flat out said he’s never going to be an NHL player.I really don't get this line of thinking with Poulin. We drafted him to be a high impact offensive talent. He hasn't panned out in that regard because of his skating which was always the knock.
People are always saying we need to "take the high reward player" and we did in Poulin and now people are mad that the high reward didn't turn out even though there are still a lot of NHL traits.
Poulin is way more of a unicorn skill set than Big Puusy and if he even is just a 15 goal 15 assist guy adding a player with that kind of flash and size would be huge for this squad.
They drafted him for the size and got burnt. Many guys below him in that 2019 draft already making decent impacts at the NHL level. The standouts being Maccelli, Tomasino, Pinto and Parssinen.I dunno a lot of people who follow WB/S closely don't have much good to say about Poulin.
I get that Poulin has NHL size and draft pedigree and probably more easily projects to be an NHLer (though probably in a depth role) but I guess I always go with higher end potential. Even if that's often a bust scenario.
Regardless this pool is like three or four guys and a sea of whatever. That's what happens when you win a lot for nearly 20 years, I guess.
Gabe is running at a 50pt pace roughly, Bleuger was at a 35pt pace roughly (the year before). So I mean, Vilardi with less production would be peak Bleuger, would it not?I don't see this at all.
If Poulin breaks into the NHL, I would imagine he's in the Gabe Vilardi realm with less production.
I don't think that is quite true. That reeks of revisionism and hindsight.I really don't get this line of thinking with Poulin. We drafted him to be a high impact offensive talent. He hasn't panned out in that regard because of his skating which was always the knock.
People are always saying we need to "take the high reward player" and we did in Poulin and now people are mad that the high reward didn't turn out even though there are still a lot of NHL traits.
Poulin is way more of a unicorn skill set than Big Puusy and if he even is just a 15 goal 15 assist guy adding a player with that kind of flash and size would be huge for this squad.
They drafted him for the size and got burnt. Many guys below him in that 2019 draft already making decent impacts at the NHL level. The standouts being Maccelli, Tomasino, Pinto and Parssinen.
Luckily for us, it seems like an extremely weak draft and we didn't lose out on much.
The 1sts since Staal for sure are so bad you wonder how that's mathematically possible.Looking up and down the Penguins draft results rn and it's like picking through the wreckage of a burned out wasteland haha
The 1sts since Staal for sure are so bad you wonder how that's mathematically possible.
But with the 2nds we did f***ing great lol.
Gabe is running at a 50pt pace roughly, Bleuger was at a 35pt pace roughly (the year before). So I mean, Vilardi with less production would be peak Bleuger, would it not?
And when I say "Bleuger-esque" I was in no way tying that to a style of play, ability comparison, etc. I was merely saying a guy who spends 3.5-4 seasons in the AHL, comes to the NHL and provides solid 4th line play and can pinch hit in the middle 6.
I don't think that's out of the question for Poulin.
I don't think that is quite true. That reeks of revisionism and hindsight.
I don't recall Poulin having a "high impact offensive talent" tag nor did anyone consider him a "High reward player". The biggest knock on Poulin was indeed his skating but I do remember people being mad when the general report was "this is a long-term project player for the Penguins", which may be the most accurate scouting report for a player in quite some time for us.
I voted Poulin over Puustinen but at the same time, I don't see Poulin having a "unicorn skill set" at all. What does that even mean? What is so special about Poulin's skill set that it makes him a unicorn?
Goes to show little value there is in scouting beyond the top 10.The Penguins have always done oddly well with their 2nd rounders for the most part.
Especially when you look at them next to their utterly shit first round selections in the same timeframe.
I don’t know why you think people are lining up with pitch forks wanting to burn Poulin at the stake. I don’t think anyone has flat out said he’s never going to be an NHL player.
There are plenty of 1st round picks that didn’t hit their offensive ceiling but still had long respectable careers. We’ve had a lot here, guys like Rupp, Fehr, Boyle, etc.
There’s a reason that NHL teams choose to pay those guys way less than one dimensional offensive pp specialists like Oloffsson, it’s because the role players are easier to find and replace for cheaper.
Goal scoring is the most coveted skill. I’ll take my chances on a high upside undersized goal scorer than a bigger, safer, less offensive output forward.
Like you said, had Poulin hit, he would have been a unicorn large skilled player that was the complete package. It was a calculated risk. He’s now reaching the point in his development where he pretty much is what it is. His skating isn’t going to improve much more at this point.