DatsDeking
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2013
- 2,104
- 946
Yeah, but Edvinsson is awesome because of preseason, but Chiarot is still awful because preseason means nothing.late goals count just as much as early goals, last I checked
Sprong has so much more swag than Raymond.
In Grand Rapids, agreed.Based on their performance in this preseason game, it's pretty clear that Chiarot and Petry should be our top pair.
Then Fischer went and was the only forward with 2 points today.Should be Berggren. Man I hate this rebuild sometimes.
Sprong can absolutely rip it.
Exactly what this team needed more of….
Early, but this pickup looks astute… all the way astute .
And I’d still much rather Berggren.Then Fischer went and was the only forward with 2 points today.
And I’d still much rather Berggren.
Does anyone have the preseason stats?
Maybe single B-side?Good try but the date of the account gives it away.
6/10. Hit the right notes but doesn’t make the album.
I don‘t understand what you are bragging about. Chiarot didn‘t shit the bad and scored from the blueline against Marlies? Congrats, i guess , but if that your standard for the season, you are up for the dissapointment, because he didn‘t liok that convincing in the process: Had hard time dealing with fotecheck and looked lost in the O tone passing to nobody. Against Leafs AHL team. If I compare this showing to Edvinsson‘s last game against NHL Leafs, i‘d rather have Edvinsson, even if he didn‘t scoreOK, I can't remember who they were -- who wanted to waive Chiarot and Fischer so we could play some rookies that have never played? Are you guys here, or are you the sort of hockey fan that's watching U of M lay a beatdown on Miami of Ohio or whoever the hell they're beating this week?
RedWingzz and norrisnick -- are you guys here? You're missing a good one, fellers.
Chiarot is far from perfect -- he's pretty slow and he tends to toss hand-grenade passes to the other d-man when that d-man is covered.I don‘t understand what you are bragging about. Chiarot didn‘t shit the bad and scored from the blueline against Marlies? Congrats, i guess , but if that your standard for the season, you are up for the dissapointment, because he didn‘t liok that convincing in the process: Had hard time dealing with fotecheck and looked lost in the O tone passing to nobody. Against Leafs AHL team. If I compare this showing to Edvinsson‘s last game against NHL Leafs, i‘d rather have Edvinsson, even if he didn‘t score
it was against leafs ahl team. they had one starter plying in the game.So, watching the highlights, Wings dominate in shots; have RayRay completely body a Leaf on his drive to the goal for a shot, albeit a stopped one; show multiple scorers; win the game, and somehow I'm supposed to be worried?
Thanks.
First off, what you're saying checks with reality. The guys y brought in were never expected to be world beaters.Chiarot is far from perfect -- he's pretty slow and he tends to toss hand-grenade passes to the other d-man when that d-man is covered.
But he's not horrid. I saw one pass-to-no-one from Chiarot last night, but I noticed 2 from Ghost-Bear (which is a little concerning.) And Walman played like absolute shit. But it's just one game.
I'm just saying: When the biggest problems, the worst things we have to worry about, the SpaceGoats, if you will, are Chiarot and Fischer -- a third-pairing guy who's not horrid, and a 4th line guy who appears to be a halfway decent if not exciting forward -- that bodes well for the team.
I wasn't boasting, I was chiding norrisnick and RedWingzz, because I thought it was amusing -- it's just one game, yeah, but everything went completely against all of the points those two (and others here) had been making all day.
I mean, if we could get norrisnick to start a new thread, "TRADE HUSSO NOW" and norrisnick would add comment after comment about Husso being unable to stop a beachball and he has no rebound control and he might as well replace his glove with a cheeseburger, then I almost feel as though Husso might win the Vezina this year.