- Aug 29, 2022
- 1,437
- 6,074
Yeah, the mixed metaphors in here sometimes are hilarious.He's going to pull the trigger on his magic wand?
Maybe wands do come with triggers. Or at least trigger warnings.
Yeah, the mixed metaphors in here sometimes are hilarious.He's going to pull the trigger on his magic wand?
Chevy has had 2 years to clear the backlog on D. Losing Stan for nothing would be poor asset management. Get whatever you can for him and just move on.Yup I agree. The fact is that we already know what the opening 7 will be unless Chevy grows a pair and waives Stan.
If Stanley in a trade could have returned something small a year ago but could return nothing at all now, then I think holding him for the extra year to see how he develops was the right move.Losing Stan for nothing would be poor asset management.
Some 1st rd are busts but we have hit on a second with berg just nature of game.If Stanley in a trade could have returned something small a year ago but could return nothing at all now, then I think holding him for the extra year to see how he develops was the right move.
Now with the advantage of time, we see that he didn't develop enough. He got passed by Samberg and now by Heinola. If we lose him for nothing then it's a sign of his value as an NHL player.
I think Capo will be waived along with one of Stanley and Chisholm. I won't be too fussed if one of them gets claimed.
Well it's going to be one or the other. Either Stan stays or he's waived.Chevy has had 2 years to clear the backlog on D. Losing Stan for nothing would be poor asset management. Get whatever you can for him and just move on.