It's Point. He has some Bergeron in his game that Nylander won't ever have. They'll probably be similar offensively, but i'd still giv ethe edge to point here too.
A little premature ?
It's Point. He has some Bergeron in his game that Nylander won't ever have. They'll probably be similar offensively, but i'd still giv ethe edge to point here too.
A little premature ?
Are you really that simple?I guess it's possible, in the same way Marner may one day have some Milan Lucic in his game.
I guess it's possible, in the same way Marner may one day have some Milan Lucic in his game.
Yeah no he doesn't. He's significantly more polished, Nylander has significantly better offensive tools.Point easily, and I think he has the higher offensive upside too. He was an absolute monster in the WHL
Name some of those significantly better offensive tools.Yeah no he doesn't. He's significantly more polished, Nylander has significantly better offensive tools.
why aren't you asking people saying the opposite to clarify? Why do you always request people voting for a leafs player and never the people voting for the Tampa player?Name some of those significantly better offensive tools.
I would if someone said something like that about a Tampa player. I was genuinely interested. As far as offensive tools go Point has the better shot, but Nylanders better at carrying the puck across the blue line. Haven't seen enough of either player to determine who's better at other offensive tools.why aren't you asking people saying the opposite to clarify? Why do you always request people voting for a leafs player and never the people voting for the Tampa player?
Holy! Victim mentality.why aren't you asking people saying the opposite to clarify? Why do you always request people voting for a leafs player and never the people voting for the Tampa player?
no, its what he does in every single leafs related thread he starts (which is a lot).Holy! Victim mentality.