Sojourn
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2006
- 50,523
- 9,377
Okay ill bite and reply. We have a rookie 2nd in points this post season. Palms and Etem has single handedly been having an outbreak year and an amazing season for us being ROOKIES "not expected btw" Soj didn't even think Etem would be called up, cool fact btw gj Soj. I don't understand how you can say youth movement blah blah. If we didn't have them? You do understand this series would be over? You can calculate the goal difference and assists for youth movement I'm not going to do it for you. Include Boner, Etem, Palms, Beleskey.
Let's break this down:
First off, Bonino and Beleskey are 24+ years of age, and both just finished playing their 3rd NHL (regular) season. It's more than a little misleading to call them part of any "youth movement" and I'm pretty sure this has been pointed out to you a number of times. You just keep ignoring it. Just because Bonino and Beleskey have taken that next step doesn't make them a youth movement. They're established players by now, and not much younger than Getzlaf and Perry.
Secondly, it's important to note when the goals, and assists, were accumulated. Out of all of the points put up by Palmieri and Etem, do you know which ones were in games the Ducks won? Two. Palmieri scored in Game 5(this one is actually significant), and Etem put up an assist in the 4-0 Game 3. The rest of the points? They were tallied in losses. So, to point to their point totals and say that we'd be out of this series if it wasn't for them is just disingenuous, and blatantly wrong. Don't get me wrong, points are points, and they deserve major props there, but don't make it sound like their performances have single-handedly kept Anaheim in this series. Anaheim is not winning games because of the 4th line. That line has done a great job of helping us get back into games that, unfortunately, we fell short in, but that really goes to show how important it is for our top six players to show up, doesn't it? In other words, the youth movement isn't going to take us anywhere without our top six actually showing up, because those are the players we need to be sharp.
Finally, I stand by my opinion of Etem at the beginning of the season. He didn't look ready. Not for the role that some people(you included) were expecting. Do you really think it's a coincidence that, when Etem returned, it was in an energy/grinding role? He wasn't ready for a scoring role, and he didn't belong in the NHL in that role. I think he's done a terrific job of making adjustments, but don't pretend you called this. You've practically been pleading all season for him to be in a top six scoring role, hoping to get him out of the very same energy/grinding role that he's been successful in this season. You can't say "I told you so" when the coach is, so clearly, not using Etem the way you think he should. My primary criticism of Etem heading into the season was that he was too one-dimensional, and I didn't think he would be able to stick so soon until he could start playing a more complete game. So, yeah, good job. That's exactly what happened, isn't it? Does that mean I get to say I called it? It happened sooner than I thought it would, which is certainly a testament to Etem's ability and work ethic, but it seems like I hit the target pretty much dead on.
Last edited: