Little Fury
Registered User
- Jun 21, 2006
- 17,831
- 6,800
The significant difference is that I was never convinced the Kevin Lowe rebuild was going in the right direction. Your preferred vision is still built on that ideal. All offense, no defense. Your argument is always 'look at these teams' always pointing to teams that have enjoyed normal prospect development and many that had established defense cores. The Edmonton Oilers were a ****ing mess, man. Connor McDavid wasn't a ****ing get out of jail free card.
Keep pointing at the big, bad Chiarelli. He traded away all your favourite players. But this team is lacking depth because the Edmonton Oilers never ****ing had any.
Have you ever considered the possibility that, while changes needed to be made and the defense needed to be fixed blah blah blah etc etc etc, the actual way they went about doing so was flawed and, not only do we have miles to go before the D can be reasonably considered "fixed", the holes created in the process have yet to be filled and may never be?