Van Buren Boy
--------------------
- Aug 18, 2006
- 1,541
- 700
If anyone wants to watch it. Essentially his take is that the Eagles have scheme issues and Hurts pretty much bailed them out.
EDIT: Video is blocked
EDIT: Video is blocked
I’m conflicted. It’s certainly gimmicky but part of me likes it still.
I’m conflicted. It’s certainly gimmicky but part of me likes it still.
I’m conflicted. It’s certainly gimmicky but part of me likes it still.
I think it was the Ravens that proposed this rule. The chances of recovering an onside kick these days are like 5%. Not sure what the likelihood of converting a 4th and 15 is but I would think it is more than that. So id probably make it 4th and 20 or 25 if they were to change it.
But if you think about some of the chances for on-sides kicks in the past before all the 'prevent injury' type rule changes it may line-up more with the % there. Onside kicks were once like 15-20% chance.I think it was the Ravens that proposed this rule. The chances of recovering an onside kick these days are like 5%. Not sure what the likelihood of converting a 4th and 15 is but I would think it is more than that. So id probably make it 4th and 20 or 25 if they were to change it.
Nope, $32,416,000.Isn't 45 m the franchise tag number?
ESP coming for all you nerds
One day they’ll understand what the actual gripe is.
I think it was the Ravens that proposed this rule. The chances of recovering an onside kick these days are like 5%. Not sure what the likelihood of converting a 4th and 15 is but I would think it is more than that. So id probably make it 4th and 20 or 25 if they were to change it.