The Red Line
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2010
- 8,456
- 4,902
Galchenyuk for AA and Zetterberg is very close value. When you consider that we take your bad goalie contract off your hands and also give you other pieces on top of Galchenyuk, you start to realize (or should realize) that it's not horrible.
Like I said, Good luck with AA in Europe, Zetterberg ridding off in the sunset, and Mrazek on that bloated contract. We will keep Galchenyuk.
lol just because you, some random person from the internet, tell us it is a good trade, does not mean it is a good trade. I personally want absolutely no part of Galchenyuk at all, let alone giving up three valuable assets for him. I would rather have AA than Galchenyuk, and then you act like Zetterberg is a cap dump lol. He is a 70 point scoring top line center and captain and defensive beast. His age is irrelevant until his play starts declining, which it has not. In this very thread there are better offers for Mrazek alone.
When every single poster in this and every other thread constantly berates you for embarrassingly awful trade proposals, maybe its time to consider that you, and not everyone else, is the unrealistic one.