My biggest concern on D is Pouliot. You expect an older Scuds and some others to be bad but DePo looks awful. The same mistakes, coasting and soft play are still there. Plus he's not really pushing offensively.
He seems like he has no chip on his shoulder and plays mopey. He's to good to be a tweener and the Pens really need to challenge him.
I agree with this. He has looked awful, no urgency, coasting...but I hadn't thought of the word "mopey." However, that kind of fits. I sure HOPE that if he's "mopey," it's not because he's basically been told that he -- due to the glut of d-men -- will start the year in WBS (and thus he's resigned to that). Look, if I were DP and I knew that no matter what, Scuds had a spot -- my spot -- in the lineup, I'd be not very happy about it either...
Another thing is that I would rather see Hornqvist play LW with Crosby and Kessel than play with Malkin. They just have contrasting styles and its a bad fit. I like Hornqvist but Malkin needs a winger that he can play soccer/ hockey with.
Someone else (Empoleon? Coach McGuirk?) proposed the idea of
Hornqvist-Crosby-Kessel
Perron-Malkin-Plotnikov
The more I think about it, the more I think that could be something viable to at least try...
Of course, I STILL say that
Perron-Crosby-Hornqvist
Plotnikov-Malkin-Kessel
should be tried.
What's the biggest problem with trying EITHER of these options, though? The fact that Chris Kunitz remains on this team -- a team where the coaching staff seems to have a hard time realizing that he's a bottom 6-er at this point in his career, on this team...
Scuderi, Kunitz, prospect, pick, retained salary, for a quality 2nd-pairing d-man, and picks to balance it out. Do that, JR, and our team is as close to perfect as it's been in the entire Crosby-Malkin era, IMO.