Gurglesons
Registered User
Do some posters not know there's a multi-post button? I had to read an entire page of posts on here from one person bitching about the players in a dozen separate posts in a row.
Hey. I’m not smart okay.
Do some posters not know there's a multi-post button? I had to read an entire page of posts on here from one person bitching about the players in a dozen separate posts in a row.
It will be the same as last year if we don't spread the wealth between Crosby and Malkin.GCR has heavily outscored the opponent this year. It's not the same as last season. You guys complain about them too much.
What? Of course it matters how good they are. L1 had 2 goals for and 5 against in the playoffs. That's a massive reason we lost. 2 of those losses were by one goal.It will be the same as last year if we don't spread the wealth between Crosby and Malkin.
It doesn't matter how good the 1st line is if the 2nd line isn't maximized.
never used it and never will....i'm here to hear other view points not hide from them. although some have come closeDo some posters not know there's a multi-post button? I had to read an entire page of posts on here from one person bitching about the players in a dozen separate posts in a row.
never used it and never will....i'm here to hear other view points not hide from them. although some have come close
No, it doesn't...we're not going to ride any one line to success. Both Crosby and Malkin's lines have to be clicking.What? Of course it matters how good they are. L1 had 2 goals for and 5 against in the playoffs. That's a massive reason we lost. 2 of those losses were by one goal.
They had concerning analytics going into the playoffs, and the board was practically unanimous in wanting them disbanded before we started that series.
This year they have 30 goals for and 17 against. Very worthy of an L1. Not maybe done in the most conventional way, but they've gotten the job done and people here should acknowledge their improvement.
Malkin's line was similarly disappointing. 2 goals for and 4 against, and they didn't have to deal with the top pair.
---
It's true that Rust has really good chemistry with Malkin. You may be correct in wanting them split up. But that depends on how Rakell will gel with whoever he gets, for me.
Who are we using on RW with Sid if Malkin gets Rakell and Rust? What if that RW'er renders the line inert?
Is it still worth it at that point to spread the wealth? I'm not so sure.
We know that ERod's not the answer.
The new Rangers are immensely better than they were before the trade deadline. Their acquisitions have changed their team. They were being carried by a goalie before, now they are dangerous offensively.This game leaves a sour taste in my mouth. I don't care about the three games in four nights; this was an important one. Beyond seeing a new glimpse into the team falling apart, this was from the likely executioner. I'm not confident against the Rangers at all.
The Avs seem to do alright with Jack Johnson playing as #6. Complaining a lot about the #6 or ZAR or whoever the next bottom six whipping boy is going to be when the entire team doesn't bother playing defense is just weird to me. Sure, these players could be better. But they are rarely losing games for us and we usually get what we pay for them, i.e. not a lot but at least our money's worth. We tend to "get cooked" in the playoffs because either nobody can score or nobody plays good defense, this happens way too often for a team that is considered a contender. It's not just the Ruhwedels of this world who struggle, it's the whole team (sometimes with an exception or two). Is it going to happen this year again? I don't know, but it's seems pretty likely.If he's the #6 they are as good as cooked.
Like others mentioned, again not advocating for Mark Madden but he had a point. Coming into a 3rd game in 4 days against a fresh team and then going to 11 forwards. A coach should already have an adapted approach.Honestly though after thinking about it some more and having a cooler head about things....how do you even change the system up mid game? How do you plan for having no skating legs? How do you even know when you will or won't have skating legs?
The answer is: you don't. There's no way to plan for having shit legs. You can try to adjust mid game if your team looks sloggy maybe and then have them change things up. But the Pens gave up 3 goals in like 5 minutes in this one. There was no time for that. The game was effectively over before the Pens could blink.
Like others mentioned, again not advocating for Mark Madden but he had a point. Coming into a 3rd game in 4 days against a fresh team and then going to 11 forwards. A coach should already have an adapted approach.
Not that I condone boring hockey, but much like our cup run when Letang was out we had to sit back more and counter strike. It shouldn't be that difficult to tell your players to alter attack strategies on the fly IF they have already been taught schemes.
The Avs seem to do alright with Jack Johnson playing as #6. Complaining a lot about the #6 or ZAR or whoever the next bottom six whipping boy is going to be when the entire team doesn't bother playing defense is just weird to me. Sure, these players could be better. But they are rarely losing games for us and we usually get what we pay for them, i.e. not a lot but at least our money's worth. We tend to "get cooked" in the playoffs because either nobody can score or nobody plays good defense, this happens way too often for a team that is considered a contender. It's not just the Ruhwedels of this world who struggle, it's the whole team (sometimes with an exception or two). Is it going to happen this year again? I don't know, but it's seems pretty likely.
I do, but they also are two of the only Penguins that actually contribute in the scoring department for the team.
They don't.
Heinen, Crosby, Rodrigues is Mike Sullivan's pornhub dream.You just want me to stop watching hockey, don't you?
Game 20 or so, fine a bad loss, move on.This could have been a statement game for the Penguins but turned out to be one for the Rangers. Yikes.
Heinen, Crosby, Rodrigues is Mike Sullivan's pornhub dream.
You speak the true true.Ironically enough, the first guy wouldn't bother me nearly as much as the last guy. At least while Zucker is out.
Personally when Zucker's back I really wish they'd go something like this in the top 6:
Guentzel/Crosby/Zucker
Rakell/Malkin/Rust
But I'm fully expecting the following when Z returns:
Guentzel/Crosby/E-Rod
Zucker/Malkin/Rust
With Rakell on L3 with Carter and Kapanen.