The Crypto Guy
Registered User
- Jun 26, 2017
- 26,569
- 33,814
Agreed. Kane was surprisingly not the problem in that game.Kane was actually noticeable, on one leg. Blame being pointed at the wrong guy. What a surprise. Everybody's favorite bromance folded and Panarin is a joke.
Kane was like our 3rd best forward. (Kreider,Tank ahead of him) He was not the problem. I'd take him back for cheap.
Pretty much the second rounder this year. We don't lose our first next year. I think also a 4th rounder next year.Pardon if this has been covered. I gave a quick look before asking.
So, what exactly is the asset hit for Kane now that we've been bounced in the first round, after conditions are met?
That was the only bright spot. Sometimes those conditions go against us. Glad it will only be a 2nd rounder now and not a 1st round pick.Pretty much the second rounder this year. We don't lose our first next year. I think also a 4th rounder next year.
Pardon if this has been covered. I gave a quick look before asking.
So, what exactly is the asset hit for Kane now that we've been bounced in the first round, after conditions are met?
Couldn't agree more with you on Panarin!I never want to see him wearing a Rangers sweater again. I don't even care if he rebounds somewhere else next season and becomes great again. I am willing to take that chance. That just guarantees I never have to see him coasting up the boards, waiting for a pass that he will immediately give away with a behind the back pass to the other team, as his dumb expressionless face then mosies to the bench to catch his breath, just so he can do it again the very next shift, ever again. Go put up 70 points for Buffalo, or something. I don't want to look at you.