This isn't a bad trade in the sense that all the pieces are terrible. They're not. It's just so bad in that the pieces they got are meh and the piece they lost is Erik Karlsson.
Duchene got a better haul and this is sad. I legit feel bad for Sens fans. That this was the follow up to that cringy Melnyk video is just so heartbreaking.
One thing to consider: we know DW is a player’s GM who values character, both on and off the ice. He keeps a strong relationship with his players.
The way that DW handled the Mike Hoffman situation, making it clear that he had no interest in having a player like Hoffman on his team, has to speak volumes to Erik Karlsson on a personal level, given that Karlsson is the player that Hoffman specifically had a rift with. DW did not know he was getting Karlsson, and he clearly made a less than optimal move for his team by trading Hoffman for merely a 2nd round pick; keeping Hoffman over that pick would have been far more optimal from a purely on-ice perspective.
It’s possible that the Hoffman situation will help DW when it comes to Karlsson. By showing that DW has no interest in bringing characters like Hoffman on his team, irregardless of whether or not they’ve got a rift with a player presently on the roster.
Why didn't the oilers beat this? It would have been worth it even with Karlsson as a 100% rental
Not sure if the list he is referring to is a list of teams that Karlsson was willing to possibly re-sign with, or merely a list of teams not on his no-trade list.
I think this is reaching a little bit but we'll see.
I just see a GM making the most of an opportunity.
Not sure if the list he is referring to is a list of teams that Karlsson was willing to possibly re-sign with, or merely a list of teams not on his no-trade list.
Don't over think it.
It's the "PLAYER X has no interest in going to EDM" list
One thing to consider: we know DW is a player’s GM who values character, both on and off the ice. He keeps a strong relationship with his players.
The way that DW handled the Mike Hoffman situation, making it clear that he had no interest in having a player like Hoffman on his team, has to speak volumes to Erik Karlsson on a personal level, given that Karlsson is the player that Hoffman specifically had a rift with. DW did not know he was getting Karlsson, and he clearly made a less than optimal move for his team by trading Hoffman for merely a 2nd round pick; keeping Hoffman over that pick would have been far more optimal from a purely on-ice perspective.
It’s possible that the Hoffman situation will help DW when it comes to Karlsson. By showing that DW has no interest in bringing characters like Hoffman on his team, irregardless of whether or not they’ve got a rift with a player presently on the roster.
Why didn't the oilers beat this? It would have been worth it even with Karlsson as a 100% rental
Because he’s not that good. If he was that good there would be a better offer.Why didn't the oilers beat this? It would have been worth it even with Karlsson as a 100% rental
Okay, so, we know Karlsson had a list of 20 teams he would okay a trade to. That is because he had that list of 10 teams that he could veto a trade to.
My question is, is Peter Chiarelli talking about this list of 20? Or, is he talking about a shorter list; a list of teams where Karlsson was willing to consider re-signing?
Forgot the I thinkBecause he’s not that good. If he was that good there would be a better offer.
Except it's not Kane's girlfriend who's in a vicious spat with Karlsson's wife.Except he's got Evander Kane signed long term who has done more way uncharacterly things than having a crazy girlfriend.
Because he’s not that good. If he was that good there would be a better offer.
Except it's not Kane's girlfriend who's in a vicious spat with Karlsson's wife.
You can bet that Doug Wilson had Karlsson targeted long before he briefly acquired Hoffman. There was absolutely no way the Sharks were keeping Hoffman, and jeopardizing a future deal for EK.
Rumor was a trade was in place at the TDLwith SJ for EK, approved by Dorian, vetoed by Melynk
Really, I can see him not wanting to stay long but if he put up 100 points with McDavid he could cash in ever harder next summer.
I read it as, Edmonton was on his no-trade list/Edmonton wasn't on his list of teams he could be traded to.Okay, so, we know Karlsson had a list of 20 teams he would okay a trade to. That is because he had that list of 10 teams that he could veto a trade to.
My question is, is Peter Chiarelli talking about this list of 20? Or, is he talking about a shorter list; a list of teams where Karlsson was willing to consider re-signing?
Back that whole thing went down so quickly I was thinking ok this is part of a two step plan:Except it's not Kane's girlfriend who's in a vicious spat with Karlsson's wife.
You can bet that Doug Wilson had Karlsson targeted long before he briefly acquired Hoffman. There was absolutely no way the Sharks were keeping Hoffman, and jeopardizing a future deal for EK.
There was always tension between Sharks fans and Senators fans because Senators fans felt like the Sharks “stole” the 2017 Norris from them.
The Sharks were kind enough to gift the Senators a Norris in exchange.
This is ridiculous hyperbole.
I bet you he doesn't resign in SJ, you in?Well it's been noted that DW has been in Ottawa for a week speaking to Karlsson's agent leading up to the trade so that made a resign quite possible. Why pull the trigger if there's no chance?
Im kind of shocked that they also sent him to SJ after they just sent Hoffman there and they immediately flip him to FL. Usually those things get you the cold shoulder for a bit. Not in Melnyk land.
I bet you he doesn't resign in SJ, you in?