strattonius
Registered User
It’s not a debate if only one person is making an argument and the other is responding ‘nice try’ and then moving the goalposts. I mean which is it, is Klingberg ‘more than adequate defensively’ or ‘not terrible’?
And I never said Myers was better defensively than Kilingberg, I said he was ‘probably a better fit for the Canucks’ mostly due to the fact Myers can be physical, like he was when in the bubble. On the contrary, Klingberg’s main value would be as a PP1 QB, which we already have.
I have a feeling Myers with OEL was better defensively in 2022 than Klingberg but I’m not going to bother finding it just to be told ‘nice try’ in the face of evidence.
And in any case, I don’t care as it’s irrelevant to the main point, which is (as all Nucks fans should know) that we need a defensively responsible top 4 RHD and that’s not Klingberg, at least not for the last few seasons.
Well I think we actually agree that Klingberg isn't the best fit for the Canucks.
Klingberg is a great transition player; good skater and passer. He's surprisingly physical and a very tenacious player in the boards. I think his defensive game is under-rated. Buuuuut he's going to cost a pretty penny for a long term.
I don't believe using analytics is evidence against anything I've said. I've said Klingberg is a better player in all areas of the ice. Where is the evidence that he's not?