Ducks DVM
sowcufucakky
I'm convinced that at least 1/4 of the SSHs are just scalpers (or people who go to 5-10 games per season).
It may go as high as a third, I completely agree. I think it was even higher when they had the 2 for 1 seating.
I'm convinced that at least 1/4 of the SSHs are just scalpers (or people who go to 5-10 games per season).
I'm convinced that at least 1/4 of the SSHs are just scalpers (or people who go to 5-10 games per season).
the main boards blow my mind. chicago is the greatest dynasty in nhl history, connor mcdavid is going to be named captain before he's even drafted, carolina is trading the 5 oa to toronto for kadri and the 24, mcdavid is going to score something like 70/90/160, the cup finals next year is going to be edmonton and toronto, the league is going to unretire 99 for toews, phil kessel is the most dynamic offensive force ever.
let's see... did i miss anything?
Ducks are the new Sharks.
the main boards blow my mind. chicago is the greatest dynasty in nhl history, connor mcdavid is going to be named captain before he's even drafted, carolina is trading the 5 oa to toronto for kadri and the 24, mcdavid is going to score something like 70/90/160, the cup finals next year is going to be edmonton and toronto, the league is going to unretire 99 for toews, phil kessel is the most dynamic offensive force ever.
let's see... did i miss anything?
the main boards blow my mind. chicago is the greatest dynasty in nhl history, connor mcdavid is going to be named captain before he's even drafted, carolina is trading the 5 oa to toronto for kadri and the 24, mcdavid is going to score something like 70/90/160, the cup finals next year is going to be edmonton and toronto, the league is going to unretire 99 for toews, phil kessel is the most dynamic offensive force ever.
let's see... did i miss anything?
the capitals were the sharks before the sharks were.
File under FWIW...2-3 years ago when picking up some tickets at 714, I was told they owned over 500 Ducks seats. I've also seen tickets on ebay from brokers in Denver and NY.
I don't think it's unreasonable to think brokers are a large percentage.
That should be illegal. I know it would be hard to enforce, but even if they put writing in some sort of SSH agreement about selling limitations, it might be enough deter some people/brokers from doing that.
of course, some will argue that if those seats are paid for in some form or another, that's all that matters as it's money in the Ducks pocket.
The Blues were the Sharks well before the Sharks were the Sharks.
The Blues also made (and lost) four consecutive SCF's as a rookie expansion team. That is pretty impressive and I'd assume some sort of pro sports record?
The Blues were the Sharks well before the Sharks were the Sharks.
The Blues also made (and lost) four consecutive SCF's as a rookie expansion team. That is pretty impressive and I'd assume some sort of pro sports record?
Maroon has yet to shave his beard... Can't imagine what he has living in there now.
That McDavid should be captain thread was solid gold
The Blues were the Sharks well before the Sharks were the Sharks.
So with the perspective of time, which team would you say played better in each game? Basically, who "deserved" to win each game?
The reason I ask is because I think a lot of us have this "we should have won in 4/5, but then they choked" impression. But now look at each game and see who actually played better? For example I think we should have won in 5 (lost game 4), but then that's only because we actually won game 5. In truth, I think game 5 was pretty even.
G1: Anaheim>>Chicago
G2: Anaheim>Chicago
G3: Anaheim>Chicago
G4: Anaheim<Chicago
G5: Anaheim=Chicago
G6: Anaheim<<Chicago
G7: Anaheim<<Chicago
So I guess by that count, the right team won the series.