I won't be surprised if he signs or if he doesn't sign because I understand both are possibilities, It's you who thinks otherwise because of "math". Perhaps you should show us your work, you may come to realize that 2+2 != 5 after all.
Taveres is going to stay in Long Island most likely and if he moves places like Montreal can outbid anything we put on the table. We can't realistically put much on the table at all because we have 3 A quality forwards we need to sign coming up.
1 - you don't have a clue as to what Tavares will "most likely" do, LOL at you pretending you do
2 - I doubt we'd get into a bidding war and if he want's to fulfill a lifelong dream by playing here we won't need to
3 - others have shown how we could pay Tavares a reasonable amount and squeeze him in under the cap, perhaps you missed those posts
If you think he won't come here that's fine, he might not. The opposite might also be true though so stating your opinions as if they were facts is absurd.
No.
Just no.
1-Nobody here has a clue
2-"YOU doubt..."
3-We are not doing that. Bank on it.
And when it doesn't happen, I'll be in the "not surprised mutha ****as" camp. For exactly the reasons I just put out.
And yes I'm speculating, like every other person not named JT. But I'm doing so with logic and common sense.
Good day sir.
I love it when people say "bank on it", reminds of the hundreds of posts that said Stamkos would come here, they too liked to use such phrases.
BTW, common sense dictates that when someone beats their chest and claims they have common sense, that means zero. The only way to convince people you possess common sense is to show some.
I never thought Stammer was going to come here at all. I always thought he was going to use the open market as leverage to get more money.
I am still in the camp that the islanders will not let JT walk, and I don't think he wants to walk.
He's pulling a Stamkos.
Article in the Athletic today about how Matthews injuries this year will cause him to miss out on over $2M in bonuses that will save us that much against the cap next season and the season after.1 - you don't have a clue as to what Tavares will "most likely" do, LOL at you pretending you do
2 - I doubt we'd get into a bidding war and if he want's to fulfill a lifelong dream by playing here we won't need to
3 - others have shown how we could pay Tavares a reasonable amount and squeeze him in under the cap, perhaps you missed those posts
If you think he won't come here that's fine, he might not. The opposite might also be true though so stating your opinions as if they were facts is absurd.
Re. Stamkos - I was just pointing out that there were a ton of people who were 100% certain they knew what Stamkos would do and they looked pretty dumb when they were proven wrong. You might be right about Tavares but you also might be wrong.
There is one thing you are wrong about now for sure, the part about the Islanders not letting him walk. He doesn't need their permission so that doesn't enter into it all.
Article in the Athletic today about how Matthews injuries this year will cause him to miss out on over $2M in bonuses that will save us that much against the cap next season and the season after.
It means that it would be a PR disaster to let him walk and it would cause doubt to their ability to retain future stars, fan interest, corporate sponsors...you name it. It would likely have the same trickle down effect that Lindros not signing in Quebec had.
As such expect them to throw the kitchen sink at him.
He's not walking.
All good points. But in the end, Lindros still walked.It means that it would be a PR disaster to let him walk and it would cause doubt to their ability to retain future stars, fan interest, corporate sponsors...you name it. It would likely have the same trickle down effect that Lindros not signing in Quebec had.
As such expect them to throw the kitchen sink at him.
He's not walking.
I never thought Stammer was going to come here at all. I always thought he was going to use the open market as leverage to get more money.
I am still in the camp that the islanders will not let JT walk, and I don't think he wants to walk.
He's pulling a Stamkos.
Right, the same way Quebec didn't let Lindros walk. I get it, good example.
Can you tell us your reasoning as to why he is pulling a Stamkos ? IMO JT can get market value anywhere he wants to go. Stammer was low-balled/outsmarted by Stevie Y because he knew Stammer did not really want to leave TB. Stammer used the Leafs in order to try to get TB to up the ante and when they did not, he accepted their original offer. I don't see the two situations being the same.
Lindros is not JT.
He's. Not. Walking.
The difference is i doubt the Islanders are trying get him to take a slight discount like T-Bay was with Stamkos.It means that it would be a PR disaster to let him walk and it would cause doubt to their ability to retain future stars, fan interest, corporate sponsors...you name it. It would likely have the same trickle down effect that Lindros not signing in Quebec had.
As such expect them to throw the kitchen sink at him.
He's not walking.
Garth Snow isn't Stevie Yzerman. Let the man see what his value is on the open market before he gives the islanders his price.
Leafs have the cap space. If both parties want it, JT will be a Leaf...and we know the Leafs want him...I mean who wouldn't? Sign and trade at the draft. JT signs 8 years X 10M AAV. 14-12-12-10-8-8-8-8.
While Marner could easily be a PPG center, why so little faith in Nylander?NYI centres Tavares and Barzal both have the same amount of points at 73 and tied for #17th in NHL scoring .
If the Leafs had simply drafted Barzal instead they would already have a PPG centre to play behind Matthews and Leafs wouldn't be in a position to be considering (if they are) paying JT +$10 mil now.
Leafs could have a pair of 20 year old centres already in the fold now both capable of point-per-game pace and the Leafs cap situation much better.
Would there be any need for Tavares?
Just saying !!!.