as swiftly as this came about I doubt it will all be settled as quickly. he does have a choice whether or not to voluntarily sell and I wouldn't bet on the three quarter vote by the other owners necessarily.
Okay, let's bet! I will bet you a hundred million billion jillion dollars that the vote will be 29-0 -- because it would be extremely
bad for business for any owner who didn't go along with the vote. Want to abstain, Mark Cuban? Good luck signing a black player ever again!
Now, if Sterling sues, it could get very messy -- but the NBA has no choice but to play it down to the bitter end. They will destroy Clipper village if they have to, in order to save it.
when the dust settles and emotions level out I think everything will take on a somewhat different appearance and I believe that there have been some very important questions raised here that will have to be, or certainly should be, examined in detail. some very critical and potentially dangerous issues have been exposed and will hopefully come to the forefront once this initial euphoria wanes.
When the dust settles, I think people will be asking two particularly uncomfortable questions:
1. Why did David Stern and the other owners enable a virulent and despicable ****bag racist to exist as an NBA owner for so long, when the evidence of his racist ****baggery was already compelling?
2. Why did the NAACP prostitute themselves by giving Donald Sterling multiple awards, and what's the value of the NAACP in the modern world if they choose to ignore racist ****baggery to line their pockets?
As far as other "very critical and potentially dangerous issues"...
"Wah, wah, boo hoo hoo, first amendment, free speech, free country": nope, not an issue. The first amendment allows citizens to speak without governmental interference. It doesn't mean other people have to put up with it. The NBA isn't The Government,
it's a business. And racist ****baggery is particularly bad for business when 80% of your employees are black.
"Wiretapping is bad": sure. The recording, according to California law, may well have been illegal, although that's not a settled point of fact yet. *If* this had been the only evidence of Sterling's racist ****baggery, that might be a key point -- but of course, it's not the only evidence, and it's not even the most compelling evidence. You can't even call his racist ****baggery an open secret; it wasn't a secret. It was broadly known. The most compelling evidence of Sterling's racist ****baggery is a matter of public record because The People dragged his racist old ass into court for it, multiple times -- and extracted the largest settlement ever obtained by the Justice Department for a housing discrimination case. [1]
and curious as to why you feel so strongly that Magic Johnson become the owner? the name of the team may very well be changed but I seriously doubt that this incident will be "erased from the history books". in my view, none of it should be quickly put to rest.
I don't actually care who becomes the owner. I *do* care, deeply, about the elimination of racist ****baggery, for reasons that I won't go into here. I like the idea of Magic becoming the owner because it seems to provide maximum karmic justice. Either way, the more suffering Sterling can go through, the better.
And you're right -- it will be difficult to erase such a master of racist ****baggery from the history books, much as we might like to do so. KINDA LIKE HITLER.
/godwin'd
//drops mic
--hank
[1]
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...y-noticed-donald-sterlings-appalling-history/