phillipmike
Registered User
- Oct 27, 2009
- 12,524
- 8,333
meh, he wants 4/72, so 5/70 would obviously be better, you're paying less and getting an extra year for free. That's not to say he will get 72, but at what point does the 5th year become a worse contract?
5/70 worse than 4/68? 4/66? 4/64? 4/60?
I'd probably say 4/64 is equivalent to 5/70 and gamble on him being worth 6 million in the 5th year
meh, he wants 4/72, so 5/70 would obviously be better, you're paying less and getting an extra year for free. That's not to say he will get 72, but at what point does the 5th year become a worse contract?
5/70 worse than 4/68? 4/66? 4/64? 4/60?
I'd probably say 4/64 is equivalent to 5/70 and gamble on him being worth 6 million in the 5th year
I'd think the starting point now would be 5/80 and go from there
For Fowler? Not likely.
Would love a 1 year deal, but would his agent do that ? It puts his commission at risk.Wonder how desperate EE is to come back now that his market looks like crap.
Would they do something creative like a 1 year deal with multiple player/team year options?
Something like 1 year, 30 million. Player option for year 2 at 20 million, team option for year 3 at 15 million?
Yes please.I am starting to wonder what this "creative" idea that both parties could accomplish to get EE back in Toronto.
I think 1 year at $25-30 million might make sense. Gives you another shot to win, and then you can evaluate guys at different positions.
Also, for those who have read the new CBA, would this also allow EE to sign again next year without the 1st round pick compensation? Would benefit him to pocket $25+ million and expand his market next year if teams don't lose a pick and see he can play 1B for a good portion of the year.
Pearce can play 2B and 1B when Travis and EE respectively need a day off, 3B if necessary and would primarily play LF. We will see how his body holds up playing a lot of games in the OF and also evaluate EE as a 1B for primarily the entire season.
Still think that allows you to make a longer term commitment to Fowler or trade for one with a longer term deal without issue.
That hitting lineup is weak.Steamer war
RF Betts (24) 5.5 --------- 3B Donaldson (31) 6.2
SS Bogaerts (24) 3.9 ---- SS Tulowitzki (32) 3.0
2B Pedroia (33) 3.6 ------ C Martin (34) 2.8
CF Bradley (27) 2.9 ------ CF Pillar (28) 2.5
1B Ramirez (33) 2.1 ----- 2B Travis (26) 1.8
LF Benintendi (22) 1.3 --- 1B Pearce (34) 1.5
C Leon (28) 1.1 ----------- LF Pompey (24) 1.1
3B Sandoval (30) 0.9 ---- DH Morales (34) 0.8
DH Swihart (25) 0.1 ------ RF Upton (32) 0.2
You back to back sentences don't add up. How is a replacement fine with a 4 WAR deficit ?Pearce/Morales are fine replacements for Bautista/Saunders, imo.
But we have to replace EE's 3-4war.
Fowler - CF
Eaton - LF
Donaldson - 3B
Abreu - 1B
Morales - DH
Tulo - SS
Martin - C
Pearce\Upton - RF
Goins\Barney
Bench : Carerra, Goins\Barney, Pearce\Upton, Jimenez
Definitely not better.BoSox now more potent on the mound than Viagra on Cialis.
We get Morales & Pearce, lose EE lose Bautista, Cecil & Benoit unexpectedly.
Meanwhile, Jays media via Sportsnet telling us now that Fowler is the man of our dreams who will magically take us beyond the Red Wall that is the new Boston rotation... oh, and there's Baltimore too.
So, we go from contender to.... to.... someone tell me what we are at this point. Because we ain't better.
And yet it is we the fans who arent WAR wizards that are wrong, and can't trust our lying eyes that Shap/Atkins are failing.
I can't say your whining was worth reading either.Reading this thread the last week has made my head hurt. The amount of dumb is astounding. Baseball please come back soon.
Haha.GM quote of the day
"If you do what you rationally want to do, you will finish third on every free agent." - Andrew Friedman.
What about 1 more year before a rebuild ?Time to brush off my Red Sox clothing, they are going to be one heckuva great team to cheer for.
The Blue Jays? Trade Donaldson, Sanchez, scorch the earth and rinse and repeat.
Our teams base is too old. Simple and final. Tulo, Martin, Donaldson have peaked. We have no farm.
Shapiro is about to do what has to be done, build up the farm.
Get ready for some lean times and go SOX>
quite possible.Two first round picks for JB and E. E. . Shapiro was never going to sign either of them. He wants those picks BAD. As do I. See ya old timers.
Ouch.Having Upton and Smoak and Pillar in the lineup guarantees one thing, the Blue Jays will be unwatchable. Nothing worse than watching guys who are strikeout specialists.
Is that fact he was offered that ?yep. The day they made the 4x$20 offer I was satisfied. That was an honest attempt to sign one of our own top FAs for the first time in.... maybe ever?
Would love a 1 year deal, but would his agent do that ? It puts his commission at risk.
I doubt this does anything to get Fowler a 5th year. Seems to me the 2 teams on him both want him at 4/60 and he wants 4/72, unless a team that wanted Desmond suddenly swoops in with a 5th year I don't see it happening.
If anything its lowered Fowlers worth no???
Fowler
Age 30 - HR 13 RBI 48 SB 13 BA .276 OBP .393
Desmond
Age 30 - HR 22 RBI 86 SB 22 BA .289 OBP .335
Desmond gets 5yrs/70 million, that's a 14 million average.
Fowler offered 4 yrs/60 million, that's a 15 million average.
Looking at the stats, ages, position. Other then Fowler hitting leadoff. I would say the offers Fowler has gotten is fair if not above what hes worth based on the Desmond signing.
This signing could have made matters worse for the Fowler camp and worked in the Blue Jays favor.
If anything its lowered Fowlers worth no???
Fowler
Age 30 - HR 13 RBI 48 SB 13 BA .276 OBP .393
Desmond
Age 30 - HR 22 RBI 86 SB 22 BA .289 OBP .335
Desmond gets 5yrs/70 million, that's a 14 million average.
Fowler offered 4 yrs/60 million, that's a 15 million average.
Looking at the stats, ages, position. Other then Fowler hitting leadoff. I would say the offers Fowler has gotten is fair if not above what hes worth based on the Desmond signing.
This signing could have made matters worse for the Fowler camp and worked in the Blue Jays favor.
That hitting lineup is weak.
You back to back sentences don't add up. How is a replacement fine with a 4 WAR deficit ?
Is that fact he was offered that ?
If the attendance drops to what it was 3 years ago ... how much will Rogers lose in team revenue (ticket prices, ?
In other words, let’s multiply the 3,050,055 tickets the Jays are on pace to sell by $27.11. From that you get $82.7-million.
I see your point of view, and it's logical. I guess mine revolves are the idea that I'm already eating crap risk wise with year 3 and 4, and have accepted that because it is the nature of the beast with FA. So it's the by that relative cost of the fifth year, but the fact that he could very well be garbage by year three, and a relative albatross for three years; underproducing and causing opportunity cost to be an issue.
I'd think the starting point now would be 5/80 and go from there
I just remembered that EE can't get 60 million to play 1st base(or DH) with his 146, 151, 150, and 134 wRC+ in the last 4 years yet Ian Desmond can get 70 to play 1B with his 116, 108, 83, 106 wRC+
Sorry if I'm annoying I won't get over this Rockies stupidity for a while.
Rockies signing Desmond likely means they try and move one of Cargo or Charlie Blackmon. Any posters here interested in them? Neither seems like a guy I would be interested in away from Coors.
Apparently the market for EE is falling through FAST
How has he not fired his agent yet? I feel for the guy because I honestly think deep down he would have settled for less to remain a Jay.
Not to mention the $10+ million value of losing the 11th overall pick.
How has he not fired his agent yet? I feel for the guy because I honestly think deep down he would have settled for less to remain a Jay.