Yeah, I get that -- I just would've done that deal on behalf of the Carolina Hurricanes, and trade him there at 5:01 on Saturday for Brett Pesce and some futures.
They've got an opportunity to win a cup this year. Do the Pesce deal and he likely solves the defensive issues. No, the offence won't be as deep, but they can tackle that at the deadline. Maybe the Blues put Parayko or Pietrangelo on the block at the deadline -- and Dubas looks like a genius.
I guess what I'm really frustrated with, is the commitment that Dubas gave to him WRT not trading him. Nylander's contract isn't a favour, or team-friendly, by any stretch of the imagination -- it's precedent setting. I think to win a cup, you've gotta get players who buy into what you're building, and he didn't do that.
He should be treated as a bargaining chip; and should have been from the moment it became obvious that he wasn't agreeing to something in the realm of Ehlers contract.
I don't think Dubas did himself any favours by being so closed-minded with "we want to sign him, we don't want to listen to trades".... say that, sure, if you think it helps your bargaining position, but then actually listen to the trade and see if you can strike a deal for a defenceman that allows the Leafs to upgrade Hainsey, and keep Gardiner.