Niku fans see his skill and can project him succeeding in the right context. Maurice and Niku are objectively a bad fit. They make each other worse. Niku's results were bad but maybe they wouldn't be in a different scenario. This isn't a great analogy but I'll use it anyways - Pionk had terrible results with the Rangers, but in a different scenario here in Winnipeg he's awesome.
i mean this can be said for any player? like, if you put any player in the perfect ideal situation they'll succeed. however, in pro-sports shit happens. you have an opponent to go against, you have linemates to consider... if niku can only be good when everything is ideal, then he is not going to make it far.
what was the right context for Niku.... he was poor defensively, didn't generate offense. idk how long the Jets could have gone with another poor dman on their roster. he was not better than Trouba-Buff-Myers on the right in 18-19, but he did get 30 games due to injuries...he had flashes of good talent/skill, but overall was not good. people bring up him being on the PP, the Jets had a top 5PP that year with Buff/Morrissey/Trouba on the point, he wasn't usurping them. he got hurt in 19-20, but when he did play, it didn't improve from the year previous. and by the on-ice measures/stats pretty sure he ranked below Bitetto even!
id say Pionk was successful in less than ideal situations.... he played with Sbisa+Kulikov+Forbot, and performed admirably. Niku most common line mates this past year were Demelo+Morrissey (not high minutes of course), and the 3 years prior was Charot+Kulikov.
we'll see if he becomes a top defender elsewhere like all the niku fans/Finnish crew regurgitate he would be, and i'll admit im wrong.
And Pionk had his best offensive numbers under Maurice, which throws cold water on the "let me be me" narrative.
Trouba too. Myers produced above his career PPG pace with the Jets (vs BUF+VAN), & of course Buff was a great point producer.