glovesave_35
Name
I was wondering the same thing.You said NHL players. Where are they?
I was wondering the same thing.You said NHL players. Where are they?
First one I looked up at random was Valiev. He doesn't have an NHL contract.Which of them does not have an NHL contract?
OK. Tell me how is it possible to play the NHL without the NHL contract. I am not asking this back-up one-night goalies. And how is it possible to trade a player without NHL contract to Habs for Plekanec and co. What a luck for the AHL team!First one I looked up at random was Valiev. He doesn't have an NHL contract.
OK. Tell me how is it possible to play the NHL without the NHL contract. I am not asking this back-up one-night goalies. And how is it possible to trade a player without NHL contract to Habs for Plekanec and co. What a luck for the AHL team!
Btw, it would be great to trade a player without NHL contract, for example a guy with SHL/Liiga/KHL contract, to the NHL team and accquire financial compensation or a player as exchange! I am for it!
Btw, per reports SKA paid around 1,6 million USD for two players to another KHL team (Amur). For comparison, the NHL pays 200-250 000 USD for much better prospect to European clubs. And Swedes love it!
I am not talking about next season, I am talking about 2017/2018 season. According to eliteprospects, Valiev played in the NHL this season. Does it mean he has not had a NHL contract in 2017/2018 season?Valiev had a contract with an NHL team when he was traded. Teams can also trade players whose rights they own. Valiev is a RFA. He has no contract for next year but his rights are still owned by the NHL team in Montreal.
Your sarcastic use of exclamation points is amusing seeing how little it seems you understand about how the league works.
And for what it's worth, the person you originally quoted was joking that none of these players are "NHL players" in the sense that none have graduated to full time NHL regulars. It was a joke. Lighten up.
I am not talking about next season, I am talking about 2017/2018 season. According to eliteprospects, Valiev played in the NHL this season. Does it mean he has not had a NHL contract in 2017/2018 season?
You used the simple present tense. "Does have", or "he has" implies a current status, not a recent past one. So the phrase you are looking for is "he did have an NHL contract". "He currently does not have an NHL contract".
I'm not sure if you're being obtuse or there is a language issue at play.
Oh snap. OP was talking about players going back to Russia for the KHL free agency period. For all intents and purposes, if your team isn't still playing in the playoffs it's your offseason. Exit interviews etc. all done. Let's not be pedantic, I wasn't. I literally didn't understand the nonsense that was being sent my way.They are still under contract until June 30th. Maybe it's you who "doesn't understand how the league works"...
I do not know why he is coming back.
I just added this "Toronto doctors story" because he said it to Russian media a few weeks ago. He had problems with the organisation all the time. You can read it here.
I just informed you about the story. Perhaps, it was written in NA media as well.But how is it even relevant? He is no longer with Toronto. So his decision to stay with St. Louis, surely isn't impacted by the way he felt Toronto treated him.
I do not know why he is coming back.
I just added this "Toronto doctors story" because he said it to Russian media a few weeks ago. He had problems with the organisation all the time. You can read it here.
Seems about right.the main "problem" he had was he wasnt good enough to claim a wing spot in our lineup. Claiming Dr's treated his concussion poorly is pure deflecting after his NHL career has failed
I think you’re taking things a little to seriousI am not talking about next season, I am talking about 2017/2018 season. According to eliteprospects, Valiev played in the NHL this season. Does it mean he has not had a NHL contract in 2017/2018 season?