shaner8989
Registered User
- Aug 6, 2005
- 23,003
- 4,920
RangerBoy said:Irving
Varlamov
Enroth
Palmer
Sauer
Berra
Neuvirth
Armstrong
Any potential steals there?
RangerBoy said:Irving
Varlamov
Enroth
Palmer
Sauer
Berra
Neuvirth
Armstrong
shaner89 said:Any potential steals there?
HabLover said:Guaranteed Pittsburgh does not take Backstrom at #2!
RangerBoy said:Irving
Varlamov
Enroth
Palmer
Sauer
Berra
Neuvirth
Armstrong
What kind of non sense is this?MN_Gopher said:Very few people if any would score 100 in the NCAA. Parise was better than Crosby when they were both at Shattucks. Parise puts up 32 points in 28 conference games. Crosby puts up 135 points in 59 games. Kessel put up 33 points in 28 conference games. Vanek puts up 33 points in 28 games his freshman year in conference. Heatley puts up 36 points in 27 games. Not to bad in comparitive company. Vanek, Heatley and Parise all played on their teams top lines. Kessel played second line. Not with Potulny or Irmen.
In compaison to Kariya. When Kariya played almost all NCAA players played HS the year before. Now there is the u18 team, shattucks putting out tons and the USHL is almost manditory if you are not a top pick. Most average players are coming in after a few years in the USHL. More top US players are staying in the NCAA and we are taking a few guys like Toews and Zajac from Canada. No one will dominate the NCAA like Kariya did.
shaner89 said:Any potential steals there?
WashJeffHockey19 said:I don't know if the original poster assumes that Helenius is already ahead of Bernier, but if not, then Riku should of course be on there
You are correct in your stats and general point that Crosby was lights-out at SSM, even compared to Parise when he was a few years older. But if you're going to rip someone for getting facts wrong, try not to mess them up too. The elder Parise doesn't coach the prep team, Tom Ward does; JP Parise coaches younger kids at SSM. Also, "Crosby" and "little ice time" are terms that have pretty much never gone together, including when he was at Shattuck.wealthmanager said:What kind of non sense is this?
While Parise was playing under his dad at Shattuck:
17 year old season: 2.33 points per game
18 year old season: 2.76 points per game
Crosby while playing in a new environment and getting little ice time for the first part of the year:
15 year old season: 2.84 points per game.
I am sure the Pens won't irritate Crosby by taking Kessel and all his baggage.
The sooner you American boys realise that Kessel will never come close to being as good as Crosby is now, the better.
From what I can tell it is the imput of 18 minds ranging from the U.S., Canada and Europe.sbtatter said:Who at McKeens are responsible for the draft lists? Is it NHL and junior league scouts, or based on what?
wealthmanager said:What kind of non sense is this?
While Parise was playing under his dad at Shattuck:
17 year old season: 2.33 points per game
18 year old season: 2.76 points per game
Crosby while playing in a new environment and getting little ice time for the first part of the year:
15 year old season: 2.84 points per game.
I am sure the Pens won't irritate Crosby by taking Kessel and all his baggage.
The sooner you American boys realise that Kessel will never come close to being as good as Crosby is now, the better.
turnbuckle said:I must say that i'm a little surprised that Wishart went up several spots and Sanguinetti dropped several spots from McKeen's last ranking. Since then, wishart had a poor showing at the Under 18s while Sanguinetti had a strong playoff showing for Owen Sound. If anything, I would have expected the opposite, Wishart dropping a few spots and Sangy solidifying his ranking.
OilerOlli said:I would be really surprised if Gawlik will not be chosen this year.
He played similar to Gogulla(2nd round pick last year!)
Helenius is #13 and is ahead of Bernier on the list.WashJeffHockey19 said:I don't know if the original poster assumes that Helenius is already ahead of Bernier, but if not, then Riku should of course be on there
MN_Gopher said:So in your world points are better. Then Kessel was better than everyone else at the world juniors? Out playing Malkin too? No points do not make the better player. And the sooner you non NCAA fans with no knowledge keep trying to put the baggage label on Kessel. We will see closer to eye to eye.
And WOW OMG Parise goes from 2.76 and Crosby has 2.84. Then they go to what a little over 2 per for Crosby and Parise is at a a buck and a quarter. Yeah thats the same in realtive translation. Way easier to score in Q. Cannot compare Q and NCAA.
He's an excellent prospect who also happened to mature early and quickly in certain facets of his game and thus was quite dominant while still young. Plus, the USNTDP attracts big attention (at least in the relatively small world of draftniks and scouts and scouting services). If anyone is to blame for overhyping Kessel, it's Phil himself for being so good. (Also blame Crosby and Ovechkin for setting the standard high).Rabid Ranger said:No one has accused HabLover of having much insight into college hockey. Bottomline with Kessel is he WAS subjected to unrealistic expectations (me included) and while he had a great year didn't live up to those expectations. That doesn't mean he isn't a great prospect, because he is. He's just been in the fishbowl for too long. At least he's handling all of this speculation about his game and character with dignity.
habs9 said:If each team picks by this rating system then Leafs would probably take Frolik rather than another Finnish goalie. That would be great but really would Frolik fall that far?
I think Frolik has huge offensive upside. Exactly what the Leafs need.
fedorov_jr said:backstrom has moved from 5-6 to 2-3 in the last few weeks... can anyone tell me more about his game and what he's done to warrant the climb? could it be people like his potential more than that of kessel/toews/staal?
fedorov_jr said:backstrom has moved from 5-6 to 2-3 in the last few weeks... can anyone tell me more about his game and what he's done to warrant the climb? could it be people like his potential more than that of kessel/toews/staal?
SectionX said:since backstrom plays for my SEL team, I can tell you that backstrom's development is nothing short of remarkable, he started the SEL season very quietly, but he became better and better with each game, and when he seaosn was over, our national coach thought backstrom was so good that he played him on our nr1 line (and we won the world championchip)
Backstrom can be described as a very down to earth guy, with a good attitude, but with a giant winning instinct, like Peter Forsberg he has critisized his play a lot that he can play better than this despite being 18 years old. He is also described to raise to any level of play that is nesicerry.
Backstrom is like Forsberg, a great passer. At the world championchip, Our veteran Jorgen Jonsson said that he doesn't have anything to teach backstrom, and that his "flip over the stick" passes is nothing short of amazing. Like Forsberg, backstrom holds his stick very close to the body which makes it difficult to take the puck away from him.
If Pittsburgh takes this guy, I think they have a new dynasty in the making.
MN_Gopher said:Very few people if any would score 100 in the NCAA. Parise was better than Crosby when they were both at Shattucks. Parise puts up 32 points in 28 conference games. Crosby puts up 135 points in 59 games. Kessel put up 33 points in 28 conference games. Vanek puts up 33 points in 28 games his freshman year in conference. Heatley puts up 36 points in 27 games. Not to bad in comparitive company. Vanek, Heatley and Parise all played on their teams top lines. Kessel played second line. Not with Potulny or Irmen.
In compaison to Kariya. When Kariya played almost all NCAA players played HS the year before. Now there is the u18 team, shattucks putting out tons and the USHL is almost manditory if you are not a top pick. Most average players are coming in after a few years in the USHL. More top US players are staying in the NCAA and we are taking a few guys like Toews and Zajac from Canada. No one will dominate the NCAA like Kariya did.
SectionX said:since backstrom plays for my SEL team, I can tell you that backstrom's development is nothing short of remarkable, he started the SEL season very quietly, but he became better and better with each game, and when he seaosn was over, our national coach thought backstrom was so good that he played him on our nr1 line (and we won the world championchip)
Backstrom can be described as a very down to earth guy, with a good attitude, but with a giant winning instinct, like Peter Forsberg he has critisized his play a lot that he can play better than this despite being 18 years old. He is also described to raise to any level of play that is nesicerry.
Backstrom is like Forsberg, a great passer. At the world championchip, Our veteran Jorgen Jonsson said that he doesn't have anything to teach backstrom, and that his "flip over the stick" passes is nothing short of amazing. Like Forsberg, backstrom holds his stick very close to the body which makes it difficult to take the puck away from him.
If Pittsburgh takes this guy, I think they have a new dynasty in the making.